Then why haven,t we found the one,s we evolved from,I know some of them had to have died,so why haven,t anyone ever found any trace of the one,s from us backward,for I know their
bone,s would be around some where.
2007-10-04 09:48:01 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
tawaen,I just ask,no need to show your true color,s
2007-10-04 09:59:48 · update #1
Any reason not to admit theres a God is all they need ..If they admitted we was created by God their theory of there is no God would be thrown out the window..I know God created us and I'm not to proud to admit there is a God and i need God for everything in my life but other cant do that.
2007-10-05 09:33:25 · answer #1 · answered by revbill_ussery 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Macroevolution is not true. It's a hypothesis that have NEVER been proven. Microevolution is true, as can be clearly seen. The problem is that evolutionists have an a priori commitment to this philosophy that they will do anything to support it .
Here are a few :
1. The use of microevolution to imply macroevolution. But the text books do not say that this is merely an extrapolation; they say it's a fact. And then when people say they do not believe in evolution (meaning macroevolution), the evolutionists point to microevolution and ridicule them (those who do not accept macroevoltuion).
2. Piltdown Man, peppered moths, Nebrasksa Man.
3. The use of a single bone to show what one of these supposed ancestors looked like. I wonder how they could take a tooth and FROM THAT ONLY, build the likeness of a homonid? Check out Nebrasksa Man. At that, it turned out to be a pig's tooth !!! NOW, they claim that no serious scientist ever believed that it was an ancestor of man. Right !!
2007-10-04 12:08:53 · answer #2 · answered by flandargo 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
get a high school biology text and look at the evidence for evolution then quit making just a ridiculous statement as you have made. Evolution has be proved a million times more than the theory of gravity so you need to educate yourself before asking lame questions
2007-10-04 10:03:41 · answer #3 · answered by wreaser2000 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
How do you know we haven't? It's not like every single early primate fossil ends up on the front page of Yahoo! News. Do a little research. I'm sure people didn't just pull this idea out of their @ss.
2007-10-04 09:52:16 · answer #4 · answered by Uliju 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I guess you do not understand a lot of things about the theory of evolution.
There have been a lot of traces of our ancestors found.
However even if there were no fossils at all there is still plenty of evidence to support evolution.
It is written into our genetic code.
2007-10-04 09:53:35 · answer #5 · answered by Y!A-FOOL 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
They have. Here is a really nice diagram, and links to all the fossils: http://www.mnh.si.edu/anthro/humanorigins/ha/a_tree.html
But it covers:
Ardipithecus ramidus
Australopithecus anamensis
Australopithecus afarensis
Australopithecus africanus
Australopithecus garhi
Paranthropus aethiopicus
Paranthropus boisei
Paranthropus robustus
Homo habilis
Homo rudolfensis
Homo ergaster
Homo erectus
Homo heidelbergensis
Homo neanderthalensis
Homo sapiens
2007-10-04 09:53:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
Thats because evolution is not true. the bible clearly states thay God is the creator. In Genisis 1:1 it says that God created the heaven and the earth.
meaning this earth has a creator.
ALso, a thing so magnificent like our planet couldn't just have come to be by accident. Just like a museum has an architect and everything made has a builder this earth has a designer and a creator and that is God.
2007-10-04 10:01:14 · answer #7 · answered by Cristy 1 · 2⤊ 3⤋
We've found lots of them. Why do you think we haven't found any trace of them? Unfortunately, the way fossilization works, there simply aren't as many fossilized remains as there were individuals.
2007-10-04 09:51:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Although environment in extreme cases (drought, etc) can cause some changes, evolution is a theory that has been proven to be not entirely accurate.
2007-10-04 13:55:30 · answer #9 · answered by hugskisses4707 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There is a huge body of bones of our likely ancestors dating from a couple of million years ago to as recently as last week.
2007-10-04 09:52:51 · answer #10 · answered by BAL 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋