http://www.rense.com/general32/americ.htm
This was an official report of the communist agenda in 1963. Very anti-biblical, and very much in support of evolution.
2007-10-04 09:08:08 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Look it up 1963 congressional report on communism agenda. I just grabbed a convienant link
2007-10-04 09:11:41 · update #1
A future crusade does concern me, im not catholic
2007-10-04 09:12:45 · update #2
I have an agenda to move, just like hitler did. The question is do you support their agenda?
2007-10-04 09:14:21 · update #3
Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.
Pretty close, it doesnt come straight out and say evolution. But we know the party supports its teaching
2007-10-04 09:26:33 · update #4
Congressional Record, Vol. 109 88th Congress, 1st Session Appendix Pages A1-A2842 Jan. 9-May 7, 1963 Reel 12
2007-10-04 09:33:36 · update #5
Just because a social ideology, no matter how corrupt, accepts valid science, it doesn't demonise that science.
Basically, evolution theory is not communism. You're thinking social Darwinism.
2007-10-04 22:05:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've just read through that entire list....it doesn't mention evolution at all.
It's an excerpt from an anti-communist rant written by a right wing political author; It has no 'official' status.
Communism and christianity have a lot in common; which may be why human nature prevents either from being implemented.
2007-10-04 09:22:55 · answer #2 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Evolution is a scientific theory and communism is a politcal theory. They have nothing else in common apart from that they are both schools of thought.
However I maintain evolution is true and I am also a bit of a socialist. Come on you reds!
2007-10-04 09:15:34 · answer #3 · answered by tom 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
That was written by the John Birch Society, for starters.
And, during Stalin's time, his chief of science was a fool named Lysenko who didn't accept evolution. The resulting goofy agriculture starved millions.
2007-10-04 09:12:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
As much as the Crusades should concern you.
Does the fact that Hitler supported a highway system stop you from driving on the interstate?
2007-10-04 09:11:02 · answer #5 · answered by Eleventy 6 · 10⤊ 0⤋
O.K. McCarthy... lighten up.
No, it doesn't concern me. Just because communists happened to agree with evolution does not invalidate a well-researched and supported scientific theory anymore than good, sane people believing in God make "Him" anymore real.
2007-10-04 09:28:24 · answer #6 · answered by K 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It scares me that the communists were more willing to support our laws (like spearation of Church and State) than the actual american people.
2007-10-04 09:18:19 · answer #7 · answered by cheezbawl2003 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Nope, not at all. One's science, one's a political ideology. You can put oil and water in the same glass, but that doesn't mean they'll mix, you know what I mean?
2007-10-04 09:14:05 · answer #8 · answered by Scumspawn 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Nope.
Just because the Commies can accept science doesn't mean that science is wrong.
2007-10-04 09:11:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
No more than my love of the Volkswagen makes me a Nazi.
2007-10-04 09:11:41 · answer #10 · answered by Doc Occam 7 · 9⤊ 0⤋