what are the 4 most widely held theories that attempt to explain th origin of the state?

Answer 1

Sounds like homework, try reading the material in your book, the answer will most likely be there.

Answer 2

A. The Force Theory
B. The Evolutionary Theory
C. The Diving Right Theory
D. The Social Contract Theory

Answer 3

who's claiming that scientists are “infallible”? For that remember, why are you asking technological expertise questions interior the religion area? a million) it is like asking "what's 10 miles north of the north pole". Like many uneducated zealots, you assume a Newtonian view of time being consistent and linear. that's extremely useful to look up Einstein and the discoveries of physics from the previous, oh, one hundred years. 2) Quantum physics has come an prolonged way in answering this. 3) Do you additionally know the version between "molecule" and prokaryote? Self-replicating DNA got here a minimum of 1000000000 years earlier the 1st organisms. 4) Amino acids needless to say kind from uncomplicated chemical ingredients. 1000000000 years provides an excellent form of time for issues to take place. that is actual sufficient to at last land up with DNA that is self-replicating. you don't desire a totally-functioned organism to try this. "Amino acids" is two words, via the way. 5) See #a million. >>So if scientists nevertheless can’t furnish any provable solutions to any >>of those questions + others I didn’t suggested, does that >>advise that genuinely they haven't any clue as to why we’re right here >>interior the 1st place? No. even though it would not advise that "a great invisible guy did it!" is the two probable the two, no longer to point a nicely suited "default" answer. advantageous plagiaristic replica and paste interest, via the way. >>God, because of the fact the author of the universe, would desire to exist outdoors His >>introduction, & hence via definition would desire to be eternal & >>transcendent. i'd desire to declare a similar approximately pixies "via definition". So what? that would not advise they exist. >>This shows that there’s an outdoors. Such an outdoors might >>be timeless. that still would not show the lifestyles of your imaginary buddy. >>So your question is illogical & invalid. no longer often.