English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

interracional?
The human race should only marry other humans.

2007-10-04 04:31:31 · answer #1 · answered by babydoll 7 · 1 1

i'm specially adversarial to gay marriage while you evaluate that's this form of trivial concern that's being inflated to create controversy the place none is mandatory. the subject is which you're utilising the notice "marriage" that's traditionally defined as a heterosexual relationship. call it something else. the reason i hit upon this concern ridiculous is that homosexuals characterize an extremely tiny minority. I see no clarification why their time table ought to be on the leading fringe of politics aside from the shown fact that it grow to be created to the two piss off religious human beings, or positioned homosexuals interior the spotlight (i'm guessing that's the main important reason). the subject with progressives is they continually could discover something to "progression" on. the place their theory of progression is dismantling all of our previous values and traditions. I understand that it is the U. S., yet because of the fact the Civil war the U. S. grew to grow to be greater of a centralized usa. formerly then it grow to be a in truth a unfastened conglomeration of States and territories. If human beings had diverse existence or religious ideals that have been unlike of their locality they relocated to a place that perfect them. subsequently Utah and the flourishing of Mormonism there. it may be great if homosexuals could set up their own community someplace the place they'd frolic in peace and team spirit and no-one would difficulty them, yet unluckily, that dreaded 14th modification defeats that probability. I abhor the shown fact that the final public of human beings could bend over to appease a tiny yet very vocal minority team. inspite of the shown fact that that's america and democracy is our meant government. So then if the final public disagrees with something for despite reason and places it to regulation, the minority could study to stay with it truly of ad infinitum complaining approximately how their rights are being violated. you notice the choose of the persons could be respected. If some choose makes a decision to overrule the choose of the final public on the grounds that that's "unconstitutional" then we do not likely have a functioning democracy, yet a judicial dictatorship. for my area, those divisive subject concerns will purely carry approximately greater social problems. If adequate everyone seems to be displeased, the Union could be threatened back. I see secession of various States as a special probability interior the destiny.

2016-10-21 00:41:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Neither. The Word of God concerning marriage is dealt with in other ways. It says nothing about inter-racial marriages.
It DOES mention quite a bit about marrying outside of the same faith.
And, if you study the genealogy of Jesus, there is good reason to believe there were inter-racial marriages in His human side history.

2007-10-04 04:36:20 · answer #3 · answered by Jed 7 · 1 0

Jesus loved Mary Magdalene. Mary Magdalene was Ethiopian and hence black.

The ten tribes of Israel that were exilled have mixed Jews with Afgans, Pakistani's, Indians, Chinese, Persian, African etc...

Nowhere in the bible is there criticism of inter-racial marriage. In fact its not seen as an issue. In those times, one could convert to Judaism, that was enough! One didn't have to change one's skin colour as well !!! (Although you did have to mangle your dangle if you know what I mean,,, snip snip..)

2007-10-04 04:36:09 · answer #4 · answered by Yoda 6 · 0 0

Two rational people should never marry. If they do, they'll produce rational children that will just become frustrated with the increasing irrationality in the world. That's tantamount to child abuse.

2007-10-04 04:35:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Moses was in an interracial marriage and his brother and sister got in trouble for dissing his wife (among other things). Interracial relationships are fine per the Bible, but inter-faith relationships are a problem.

2007-10-04 04:32:39 · answer #6 · answered by Rossonero NorCal SFECU 7 · 3 0

Yes. What is not Biblical is not believing in Jesus.

2007-10-04 04:31:58 · answer #7 · answered by Tamm 4 · 0 0

My Bible does not tell me not to marry someone of another race. It does instruct no to marry outside one's religion or be equally yoked.

2007-10-04 04:33:12 · answer #8 · answered by uidittybop 2 · 1 1

Man bang who you want and be with who you want. It's that simple.

2007-10-04 04:33:26 · answer #9 · answered by Steve P 3 · 0 0

rebel do not convert if there's any slicing involved

2007-10-04 04:30:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers