http://www.allabouttruth.org/does-god-exist-scientifically-aat-2dbd.htm
This is not a hey look I have proof one, I found this website and want to know by all types of people what you think about it. I have read a few things and found one flaw, so please answer truthfully and serious, thanks mgmt.
2007-10-04 02:50:15 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I approve of any site that opposes Evolution,Darwin and atheism
2007-10-04 02:56:39 · answer #1 · answered by Sentinel 7 · 3⤊ 6⤋
It conjures up a vauge bordom and mild disappointment at the ignorant people who still parrot 'Concept and design necessitate an intelligent designer' as a valid excuse for the existence of God. It is not.
However the rest of the website is interesting because it aims to provide evidence for God, which is of course impossible. However it's ultimately written by theists which are not impartial, whereas scientists have to train themselves to be so.
2007-10-04 10:00:02 · answer #2 · answered by tom 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I scanned it, read a few of it's articles, quickly discovered a few misrepresentations and cherry-pickings, then read that their agenda is to 'prove' an already religiously framed (leading) 'question' using a false premise, ergo:
Right, the opening gambit, (all looks innocent so far) then they hit you with this weird 'pseudo-enquiry':
"consider the following self-evident and universally recognized truth: Concept and design necessitate an intelligent designer."
OK, so first I am being required to accept that the universe is a conceptual design ... because then, obviously, I will just have to believe that it needs a 'designer'?
Bzzzz.
Try again. Two assumptions (from incredulity) do not one 'self-evident truth' make.
Religionists and science always part company where such dishonesty enters the debate.
2007-10-04 09:56:20 · answer #3 · answered by Bajingo 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It is a link site which can be helpful to people.
However, I don't think the URL is accurate. It should be All about Theory, or DefendingIntelligentDesign.com.
Calling Intelligent design 'the truth' is too presumptuous as it uses circular logic. An intelligent designer is complex and therefore must have been designed.
2007-10-04 10:09:54 · answer #4 · answered by ɹɐǝɟsuɐs Blessed Cheese Maker 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well. You can't just take a verified scientific fact and just rearrange it to how you feel it should be without any peer review.
I can't decide that Gravity is different and then that becomes fact. That is not how science works.
2007-10-04 09:55:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
You only found one flaw? That entire website is a flaw.
2007-10-04 09:57:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, I sit here so long sometimes, it feels like my butt is dead, hope it's Saved!!! I really wouldn't want to see my butt in hell! :)
Tap Tap Tap
What?
He's talking about that Link he gave.
Oh! Let me click on it, just a minute---hmmmm.
2007-10-04 09:59:14 · answer #7 · answered by maguyver727 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Misinformation written by someone who admits to not being a scientist.
2007-10-04 09:57:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
You should check out www.ministerturnsatheist.org.
2007-10-04 09:56:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋