English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

would it be better and more productive for atheists to call themselves secularists as Sam Harris suggests:
http://www.humaniststudies.org/enews/?id=317&article=0

2007-10-04 01:54:37 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

6 answers

That would just confuse the religious. They are confused enough already.

2007-10-04 01:57:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Sam Harris, the Martin Luther of Atheism? It's only a matter of time before atheist divide up into different sects. You already have the militants, the pacifists and the intellectual atheists. The problem is none of these are actually atheists and those who are atheists probably don't even call themselves that.

2007-10-04 09:02:15 · answer #2 · answered by usaisthebestest 3 · 0 1

Being an atheist, I would rather be called a reasoning human than a stupid, brainwashed, irresponsible and superstitious nut-job, who displays all the finest characteristics of a sheep, as most believers in any god are!!!
People of the world - think for yourself!!!

2007-10-04 09:09:11 · answer #3 · answered by crispy1 2 · 0 0

we are atheist, i like the name, it starts with a, so its close to the top of the list...easy to find

2007-10-04 09:01:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

according to the bible Paslm 14:1 and 53:1 God calls them fools

2007-10-04 09:01:18 · answer #5 · answered by jesussaves 7 · 1 3

we could call christians 'non-secularists' lmao!

2007-10-04 08:59:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers