It's simple. It's not our country and therefore shouldn't be trying to interfere in their affairs. Their country has ran fine without us for this long so I'm sure they know what is or isn't best for their people. We may not like it but guess what...we don't live there and we never will.
2007-10-03 19:00:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by wcsc12 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
As stated, what's the benefits for us to intervene?
We only intervene where it's possible for us to gain an advantage. If there isn't some gain involved, WE don't get involved.
That's politics. IF you hadn't learned that yet, you need to pay attention more to what actually happens in the world.
There is always a reason for what we do, and if thier isn't, we don't do it. Simple as that...
2007-10-04 07:45:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by xxxVIPERxxx 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The U.N. can only go where they are requested to go, they are not in the habit of mounting invasions.
The problem is basicaly a local Burmese political one and the should try to resolve it themselves.
2007-10-04 02:00:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by conranger1 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Our President went to the UN... It fell on deaf ears.
America cannot help now, the international community would condemn us and call us "invaders"
Why doesn't another country help? Why always the USA?
2007-10-04 01:54:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dina W 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
they will not send anyone.unfortunately, they have no way to pay back, the monies that will be spent.They have nothing valuable in the country,for anyone to take as payment....why do you think, no one does anything for Africa...sounds sad, but thats how it is..
2007-10-04 06:30:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Chocolate_Bunny 6
·
0⤊
0⤋