2007-10-03 13:34:47 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The Childs father was Dodi Fayed who died in the accident with her.
.
2007-10-03 13:44:14 · update #1
If the propsed theory is correct, then definitely YES
2007-10-03 13:45:06 · answer #1 · answered by Happily Happy 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
at the beginning, i don't think of Diana enjoyed her functionality as a member of old aristocracy. She grow to be greater a celeb than a royal. Many Britons don't think interior the monarchy and sophistication device. 2d, she probable would have beloved to paintings as a goodwill ambassador for the U.N.. She grow to be drawn to HIV/AIDS in Africa, landmines and toddler welfare coverage interior the 0.33 international. 0.33, she grow to be now not married to Prince Charles. He married his mistress. She may be the destiny Queen. i does not difficulty approximately Diana's ethics. Forth, she did not characterize the Church of england. Britain is many times an earthly society. that's a ceremonial functionality. that's needed lively individuals of the Church. She wasn't against Christianity yet did not actively profess to be a committed Christian. that did not mean she did not have faith, yet she wasn't the church-going variety. 5th, a private marriage between an Egyptian Muslim and an earthly Brit is a private count. we don't stay in a segregated society. i'm not greater against that marriage than i'm against the different. we have not have been given any splendid to dictate who marries who. some human beings marry exterior their faith. purely because of the fact i'd favour reform in Islam for the sake of Muslims and the West does not mean I even have something against person Muslims.
2016-10-20 23:21:58 · answer #2 · answered by joleen 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In the very unlikely event that this is true, I don't think "Christiandom" would be any more threatened by Muslims than it is now...
My Granny had some great advice.
She said, "You know, Sweetie, it isn't always true, what they say about there always being fire where you see a bit of smoke.
Sometimes, it just some damned fool, playing with matches..."
2007-10-03 13:49:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
First, she isn't ex, she is just dead. Secondly, no, the child wouldn't have been an heir to UK (would have had to been fathered by Charles, not Diana for throne), but would have been to Morocco.
2007-10-03 13:37:56 · answer #4 · answered by Gardener for God(dmd) 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is one weird hypthetical question.
If she lived, if she had a child with a Muslim father, that child would have been no threat to the UK or to the Christian Church.
Pastor Art
2007-10-03 13:38:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes. The royalty would become Islamic, o longer christians, it will make christians think twice. That's why They killed princess Diana
2007-10-03 19:01:21 · answer #6 · answered by azim_cymo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. He would have been third in line for the crown and highly unlikel;y ever to get it unless a freak accident ocured..
What unborn son are you talking about?
2007-10-03 13:37:25 · answer #7 · answered by Ivana Cracker 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Ho-boy! I think your aluminum hat fell off. Diana wasn't pregnant when she died. They can test for those things now days. Doncha know?
2007-10-03 13:38:31 · answer #8 · answered by Hammer 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't believe they confirmed a pregnancy, and to speculate the 'what if's' and 'what fors' is a waste of time and energy.
Just let the dead sleep. Enough of digging thru graves for some spicey gossip!
100307 7:35
2007-10-03 13:38:11 · answer #9 · answered by YRofTexas 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
no.if she was pregnant (not that i know of)it would have no baring on the U.K. Charles and Diana were divorced and Charles wasn't the father.
2007-10-03 13:39:54 · answer #10 · answered by katdandawn 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋