For a real climate change activists could i get links where i can read about it.?

Question

Sceptics, can you also give me some links that prove climate change wrong.
Please all give me links about how much co2 nature produces, and how does earth get rid the co2 in it's atmosphere ( trees don't. Trees, after they die they release co2 back into the atmosphere)

Provide me links about new ways of producing energy, etc
Hard statistics.

Answer 1

http://green.yahoo.com/living-green/;_ylt=AjrB5HyHLCi.xP9YDh2YlMyGV8cX

This is the best website i've ever visited. Not only does it have info on Climate change but it also provides tons of sollutions and ideas of going green as a person, family, community, etc. Seriously, check it out. Also, if you check it out you'll find other links about Climate Change.

For the skeptics.
http://newsbusters.org/node/10604...

http://sermons.trbc.org/20070225_11am.ht...

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/mar...

http://www.globalwarminghoax.com/news.ph...

http://allthingsconservative.typepad.com...

http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story...

http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jht...

http://www.livescience.com/environment/0...

Answer 2

they have been attempting this for greater beneficial than 30 years and it is not plenty distinction from then to now. Dawei talks approximately image voltaic thermal that's rather the backyard hose interior the sunlight consequence. it could artwork interior the barren region yet i attempted it interior the south east here and it became a waste of time utilising fifty 5, 380 and 5000 gals of water. Antart. makes use of an analogous scare strategies like 80,000 vehicles, hundreds of thousands and kazillions of Co2 being pumped into the air. actual that Co2 is a hint gas. Why do you think of it somewhat is measured in areas consistent with million. How can one clarify the international temp. dropping and Co2 growing to be, no longer basically now yet additionally interior the previous. you may die from severe oxygen concentrations additionally. Doubling of the Co2 won't make plenty distinction. If including greater CO2 to the sky mattered, we'd see it in ice cores and thermometers. We don’t.

Answer 3

RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists. Be warned though, you will find no sound bites or easy reads. It is real science and it takes WORK to read and understand.

Answer 4

The internet skeptic on YouTube and at www.stopdumbingdown.com has some interesting thoughts. Unfortunately, his website has many broken links. However, his presentations are informative and many of his arguments are compelling.

Answer 5

By far the best site I know is:

http://profend.com/global-warming/

These are also good:

http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science/
http://www.realclimate.org
"climate science from climate scientists"

This one refutes most all of the "skeptics" arguments.

http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/dn11462

Answer 6

I think part of your question is, could global warming be mostly natural? if so, here is some material that offers some alternatives to atmospheric CO2 as a driver for climate change.

http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles%202004/Winter2003-4/global_warming.pdf

http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory/2003/0313irradiance.html

http://www.fel.duke.edu/~scafetta/pdf/2005GL023849.pdf



.
.

Answer 7

yes