Scientists can only draw conclusions on what they find, not on what they can't find.??

Question

then science can't even disprove the existence of unicorns!

Dear sweet st.aliao...you are so wrong...I ask probing questions..that is all.

Answer 1

If we had evolved as they say,there would be fossils of
the one,s we evolved from,that in thousand,s of year,s and
we haven,t found any form of proof of the bone,s of them
should tell you it is false.

Answer 2

Actually, that's not entirely true. We can't discern dark matter, but we can make a pretty reasonable guess that it's out there.

As for unicorns, we can logically assume that there is no such thing. If someone brings forth evidence, then science will jump on board.

Clearly, you're trying to make some kind of case for God. But the proof for God's existence lies squarely on the shoulders of believers. You can't expect science to embrace something so fantastical without providing some kind of evidence.

Bring on the thumbs-down all you want. It's true. I'm sorry if it threatens the little fantasy world you've built up for yourself.

Answer 3

Science is not about fact, it's about evidence. Absence of evidence is also evidence, but it's all superfluous to the point. That being that whatever science declares is accepted as infallible proof. Therein lies the fallacy of man and the validation of Col. 2:8 which speaks of the Doctrine of Man.

Answer 4

That is why Evolution is NOT science.NO science textbook writer was here even 500 years ago,let alone millions.So,how can a book that states "millions of years ago......" be called Science??

Answer 5

Ok, now I believe you are a troll.

Or an extremely ignorant person.

Perhaps both.

Answer 6

LOL. YES!