It just seems that there is no way to avoid this conflict.. What do you think?
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1189411524152&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
2007-10-02 17:02:29 · 17 answers · asked by † PRAY † 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I was hoping that the troops would come home from Iraq, but we will only be sending more if we do a strike on Iran.
2007-10-02 17:03:27 · update #1
What's better:
a) Do nothing and let them build nuclear bombs and then threaten the USA and their allies
b) Hit them hard before they build their bombs...
Option b) would save lives in the long-run.
But, don't worry.. Bush has already indicated many times that he wants a peaceful end to this conflict. And, Congress would never approve it... unless Iran is foolish enough to attack the USA first.
2007-10-02 19:06:43 · answer #1 · answered by Plondaranera 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The current administrations of both countries are seemingly on course for such a conflict !! Both "heads of state" have their own personal reasons to want this !!
The guys in Iran want to be the warrior-princes of the Arab Empire --- and Junior wants to be the iron-fist of God !!
Odd as all this is, though -- the citizens of both countries (for the most part) are horrified by the meer thought of such a thing !!
I would be extremely surprised if we are not into a genuine bloodletting festival of fire well before the Bush team vacates the White House --- it will be his way of "locking in, the stay the course agenda" that he so desperately wants to saddle the country with !!
2007-10-03 00:23:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
With America heading toward a war with Iran, inadvertent or otherwise, the picture of how the conflict is likely to pan out is becoming clearer. In an all-out war, the basic American military tactic will be air attacks, naval blockades, offshore bombardments, and the destruction of oil and power infrastructures and Iran's naval presence in the Persian Gulf.
2007-10-03 00:16:02 · answer #3 · answered by eagleman 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It CAN be avoided, even with the President of Iran opening baiting the West to strike him down
2007-10-03 00:09:27 · answer #4 · answered by Experto Credo 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It depends on whether or not Bush can drum up enough support before he leaves office.
Obviously, nobody else in either party would do such a thing, so it's all just a matter of timing on Bush's part.
2007-10-03 00:05:48 · answer #5 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Vote, and hope. But there is a way to avoid war. Don't vote for the types we have in govt. next time. Th' folk on the govt forum can add to this.
2007-10-03 00:13:26 · answer #6 · answered by hamoh10 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
that depends how much oil there is. and also depends on how foolish Americans are. u know some stupid reasons like freedom to the people bullshits! dying by the thousands just for a few drops of oil. Americans are stupid so as to say.
2007-10-03 00:06:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
well i heard on the news and read in a few articles that it could happen in the next ten months. then i was reading it could happen as early as October this year. not by American forces but by Israeli then followed by an American attack. overall i do think the conflict is inevitable even the irani president is continually threatening america and israel
2007-10-03 00:10:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I hope not but it does seem to have been written in the wind years ago and playing out now.
2007-10-03 00:19:48 · answer #9 · answered by Rational Humanist 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I cant help but feel that Iran is doing all it can to invoke or provoke the US military into attacking.
It seems almost pre-destined.
2007-10-03 00:06:03 · answer #10 · answered by Noone i 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋