English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

and iraq who would emerge victorius? its for a class discussion.

2007-10-02 16:34:21 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

4 answers

Australia

2007-10-02 17:02:04 · answer #1 · answered by justgetitright 7 · 0 0

Unfortunately, WWIII will be global suicide, therefore in answer to your question, as long as there's rational superpowers who believe in MAD, there will be no WW3. By definition, the next world war wil be nuclear, how could it not. In a nuclear war there will be no winner. In a nuclear world, the only true enemy is war itself.

The next World War will involve a nuclear exchange, how could it not if both sides believe no price for victory will be too high. In the first 30 minutes, nearly a billion people will have been vaporised, mostly in the US, Russia, Europe, China and Japan. Another 1.5 billion will die shortly thereafter from radiation poisoning. The northern hemisphere will be plunged into prolonged agony and barbarity.

Eventually the nuclear winter will spread to the southern hemisphere and all plant life will die. You ask what country would be victorious, you are asking when will we commit global suicide. My answer is it won't happen soon because the larger superpowers are more rational than the rump states in the middle east.

While we hear talk of a nuclear-Iran or a confrontation with NorKor, little is said about the 2 bulls in the glass shop. The arsenals of Russia and the US are enough to destroy a million Hiroshimas. But there are fewer than 3000 cities on the Earth with populations of 100,000 or more. You cannot find anything like a million Hiroshimas to obliterate. Prime military and industrial targets that are far from cities are comparatively rare. Our biggest threat is from an accidental launch by the Russians.

At the point of global suicide, it doesn't matter who is on what side.... In a nuclear age like i said before, the only true enemy is war itself.

2007-10-03 03:02:28 · answer #2 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0 0

I would say none. With that much nuclear power we would all be blown to bits. If not blown to bits, everything would be so blown up we would be Back like 3rd world countries.

2007-10-02 23:46:22 · answer #3 · answered by wherewhenwhatwhywho 5 · 0 0

i certainly do not want a WWIII

2007-10-03 00:58:18 · answer #4 · answered by loser 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers