Considering that we know al qaeda's next attack is going to be nuclear on multiple cities. Why would libs want to undermine our military and war of ideas while also doing nothing to retaliate until we are attacked again?
2007-10-02
11:49:59
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Military
Nigelshift:
A. You are wrong about D-Day more Americans were killed in 9/11 than in D-Day look it up!
B. Al qaeda claims to have nukes and ALL of the captured Al qaeda members we interrogated talk about the same plan multiple nikes in U.S. cities and ports.
C. Middle eastern media all the claim the same thing don't be naive
also Iranians are planning the same thing they say so in the farsi media often and do have hezzbollah cells in the U.S.
Get YOUR facts straight
2007-10-02
12:11:47 ·
update #1
Less than 3,000 U.S. troops were killed in D-Day
http://warchronicle.com/numbers/WWII/ddaycasualtyest.htm
2007-10-02
12:13:29 ·
update #2
I said 9/11 killed more Americans than both D-Day and pearl harbor. Not more than both combined!
less than 3,000 Americans KILLED on D-day.
Less than 2,500 Americans killed at pearl harbor.
Over 3,000 American civilians killed on 9/11
2007-10-02
14:01:06 ·
update #3
Shel: What makes you so sure about that? There is planty of evidence to the contrary. Besides do you think they will fear hillary? They certainly did not fear Bill Clinton!
They attacked him many times and he did nothing! He is the one responsible for bin laden thinking U.S. is a bunch of cowards.
WTC 1
Somalia (black hawk down)
U.S. embassy attacks
U.S.S. Cole
All Bubba did was back an army that was sponsored by al qaeda(KLA)
and destroyed bin ladens enemy for him (our allies the serbs)
Bubba took the typical liberal approach and didn't retaliate and also helped them out and said to the muslim world "see we're not against muslims we're helping you in serbia" but did that work.. no we got 9/11 shortly afterwards. perfect example of failed liberal policies. The answer is no we are not safe with a female clinton in the WH.
2007-10-02
14:14:43 ·
update #4
Liberals wont be happy until the American Death Toll equals the A Rab death toll in I Rack, then again they stay well away from the military and in times of crisis are expert draft dodgers.
2007-10-02 12:00:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Alan S 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
More were killed on d-day and pearl harbor then 9/11. Al qaeda would like to have nukes but don't know body knows what there next attack will be. Nice comment on the libs though.
2007-10-02 19:52:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Shello 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Dude,, since you think you know stats so well it would be safe to say that you know that more Americans have died in Iraq than died on 9/11
Here is the simple CONSERVATIVE reality. You don't win by negotiating with your friends.
The most Liberal position of all IS TO GO TO WAR.
Ironic don't you think that 40 years ago we elected a Republican president to end an unpopular war, and now we have elected a Democratic Congress for the same damn reason.
Absolutely amazes me that somehow since we happen to have a Republican president WAR has become a Conservative policy. You guys literally do not know what the word CONSERVATIVE means.
Conservative philosophy is to have a strong military SO THAT YOU DON'T HAVE TO USE IT, and can NEGOTIATE from a position of strength.
2007-10-02 20:21:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by tom l 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
AL QUEDA DOESN'T HAVE NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES. Al queda isn't going to go that big in the near future. What they are going to do is call up all their sleeper terrorists cells here in American, and there are thousands the government knows about them, they are going to start hitting smaller, but crowded targets. Such as weddings, casinos, amusement parks, etc. Those kinds of things. Al queda doesn't, that I know of, have nuclear capabilities. Iran says they do but they don't. Iran blows a lot of smoke up the media's a*s
And that Iranian president Allaymuckwhateveryournameis is a total and utter whack job.
And it took 60 years to catch America with their pants down, again, on 9/11 so no worries nothing bad will happen in the near future. I promise. And no matter what is going on in congress with whatever party. We are safe. For now.
Whoa, Whoa, Whoa......Middle East media is controlled by their government so all they spill out is what the government wants us to THINK, not the facts darling. Al queda DOES NOT have nuclear capabilities. Just because Al queda say they do, they don't. And for piece of mind sake. Even though we can't find Bin Landen, we defiantly would have found a nuclear weapon by now. They are kind of hard to hide and infra red and other imaging would have found it. Seriously.
xxx
2007-10-02 19:07:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Shel 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
Well Nigel may be correct about some of your misinformation, but he is dead wrong regarding fighting the war at home versus abroad. He also forgets the fact that we only have about 30% of our military in Iraq, so we are prepared to protect the home front. And the fact that we have not been attacked again since 2001 is precisely because we took the fight to them.
2007-10-02 19:03:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Just wonderin' 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
D-Day 4900 to 5500 American dead
Pearl Harbor 2341 American dead
Way more than 9/11
2007-10-02 19:28:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by hdean45 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Well DUH, aren't you the epitome of mis-information, hysteria and irrational fear.....
Who told you Al Queda has nuclear weapons?
Who told you more Americans were killed on 9-11 than on D-Day?
Who told you that there is any connection whatsoever between Iraq and Al Queda and 9-11?
Doesn't it make SENSE to you that if we wanted to defend against attack, we'd have troops HERE and not in some god-awful desert fighting ghosts in a useless war?
2007-10-02 18:56:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
2⤋
i dont know, this is what i pose as a question to all liberals. what good do they think can be accomplished by pulling out? they need to stop thinking about whats good for their party and start thinking about whats good for the nation because with out our nation, their party will be killed.
2007-10-02 19:54:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Para-diddle 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
dude,you need to get your facts straight,(9/11) was a picnic compared to d-day.the rest of your statement is ok.keep up the good work!
2007-10-02 19:10:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Can i throw my two cents in, over 6,000 marines died at Iwo Jima....
2007-10-03 03:09:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Its not me Its u 7
·
1⤊
0⤋