Who else thinks that global warming should go in the politics section?

Question

I think it should becasue that is all that global warming is. It is not casued by man at all. It is only a libearl plot to raise taxes.

Answer 1

Whata ya retarded? Global warming is the first thing people think of when someone says "whats happening in the ENVIRONMENT right now?".

has nothing to do with politics. man is causing global warming

Answer 2

Global warming isn't a plot for liberals to raise taxes. They don't even bother making up excuses to raise taxes, they just do it anyway. Global warming was created so that the people think the government is actually doing something besides taking out hard-earned money and giving it to welfare. Global warming doesn't exist, except in the minds of the people liberals have convinced. The politicians just want a problem to fix, the media wants a story to cover, and the celebrities want a cause to support so they sell more music. The Green Earth concert is a perfect example. The celebrities got to promote their music, the media got their story, and Al Gore was "raising awareness." Yeah right. As if we hadn't already had global warming shoved down out throat. But the media applauded him for, "alerting the public" to this "serious issue." The liberals act like we had been covering global warming up, and no one knew anything about it until Al Gore decided to have his concert that probably polluted more than a neighborhood in an entire year. Some hero.

Answer 3

I don't know if these categories exist on YA, but I think global warming should first go into a weather/climate section, then environment. If it ever goes into the politics section it would be because it has been made a political issue which is typical of what politicians do for their own gain. Remember, global warming will happen regardless. Even if everything that is producing more greenhouse gas was halted today, even if no more oil or gas or coal was used. Even if no more cows burped or tooted. No matter what global warming will still occur, just as global cooling will occur in another 100,000 years or so.

Answer 4

No. It belongs here. You obviously have little understanding of global warming or you would not have posted this question. So perhaps you should wander off to play in the politics section and leave those who can be bothered to read about it behind here?

Answer 5

I would be happy if people would just stop asking a question that consists only of the two words "global warming".

Like the one in the source for example.

Answer 6

Well I hope that global warming isn't the only environmental problem that politicians and the goverment are concerned with. There should just be a environmental concerns section to the politics section...otherwise, its right where it belongs.




xoxo.*

Answer 7

Personally I think it should go into the trash. Because I am sick of this. Especially when celebrities and politicians go on about it. Good God, these are people who live in huge houses, has private jets and yachts, entourage of cars and they say the average citizen is to blame for their little global warming? It is all absurd especially if you truly look into it. Some of them know they lost and because of this now want to make it a crime to deny global warming. Look it up. It is all there. And it is all absurd. There is a reason why global warming enthusiasts never debate a real scientist but instead talk to people who either believe it or know nothing of Earth Science 101.

Answer 8

that is lots like how maximum philosophers are particular that the optimal religions are lies, yet in politics that is grossly divided. the belief of international warming disagrees with non secular doctrine pointing out that Earth replaced into made for guy. meaning conservatives will fantastically lots do something of their potential to forget approximately info and declare that international warming has a "liberal bias" (wtf?) to respond to your question terrific, i assume, in politics there is somewhat lots bias and ideology. very few human beings on right here somewhat researches the subjects independently...they only believe despite their social gathering tells them to. ----- much less biased answer ----- Conservatives and liberals will disagree on very almost something just to variety themselves

Answer 9

Liberals like these?

"Former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich challenged fellow conservatives to stop resisting scientific evidence of global warming"

"Pat Robertson (very conservative Christian leader) 'It is getting hotter and the ice caps are melting and there is a build up of carbon dioxide in the air. We really need to do something on fossil fuels.”

Ford Motor Company CEO William Clay Ford, Jr. "I believe there is now more than enough evidence of climate change to warrant an immediate and comprehensive - but considered - response. Anyone who disagrees is, in my view, still in denial."

"The science of global warming is clear. We know enough to act now. We must act now."

James Rogers, CEO of Charlotte-based Duke Energy.

"Global warming is real, now, and it must be addressed."

Lee Scott, CEO, Wal-Mart Company

"Republican governors team up against global warming"

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Republican_Governors_team_up_against_Global_0716.html

"the overwhelming number of scientists now believe that there is significant human cause,'' Giuliani said, adding the debate on the existence of global warming "is almost unnecessary ... ''

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/02/13/GIULIANI.TMP

"(from Republicans for Environmental Protection) The consensus of almost all climate scientists is that global warming is already happening, that human actions are causing it, and that it will cause major problems for our planet."

http://www.rep.org/news/GEvol5/ge5.1_globalwarming.html

"National Review published a cover story this past week calling on conservatives to shake off denial and get into the climate policy debate"

Answer 10

you go
I am staying here ,
with the trees

not all questions are political ,
some of us have a choice

and there are many climates
that farmers have changed
irrelevant to the hot air
politicians are causing