I would not like to you guys feeling but i heard Bush was planning on this or jews.Did you know the day when WTC was crashed,5000 jewish workers absent?And some ppl in the building here bombs there rather than the plane crashing?I mean,how can a plane destroy the tallest building?
2007-10-02 01:58:13 · 20 answers · asked by Lost my everything.. 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No, I don't think it was faked. But I do admit that it wouldn't surprise me if GWB knew about it in advance and did nothing, or even that he had secret communication with people who had secret communication with the terrorists. It was interesting how quickly he seized on that as an excuse to overstep his authority and compromise our Constitutional rights in the "Homeland Security" laws.
It was certainly convenient for Bush, but I will await further evidence that he actively participated in planning it. I simply don't believe everything I hear from either side of this issue.
2007-10-02 02:06:04 · answer #1 · answered by auntb93 7 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Everyone loves a conspiracy theory, and no doubt the government are up to all sorts of sinister and Machiavellian plans we don't know about.
However.
If you think about the enormity of what you are talking about, the cover up operation and the number of people (not to mention the supposedly absent Jewish workers) who would have to have been silenced... you realize it would be impossible in a world where information can be passed on so easily.
Why, why would America want to do it?
If they were going to do something to create an excuse to wage a war on terrorism and the East, don't you think they would have found an easier way to do so which didn't involve messing up the global economy (which is effectively what 9/11 did)
2007-10-02 02:07:55 · answer #2 · answered by HP 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I have looked at many of those so-called "conspiracy theory's" it's all bunk, look, Bush was only in office for less than a year before that happened, an elaborate plan such as that would have taken much longer than that to pull of.
In addition, Popular Mechanics calls these "theory's" bunk.
Not one piece of Det cord was found, not one remant of blasting cap or other evidence of munitions were found.
This has been gone over many times, The Fire from the near full fuel tanks on the planes heated up the load bearing supports in the center of the Towers causing them to collapse, when the suppots collapsed, the support under it could not sustain the weight from the one above collapsing like that, and then it collapsed, then the same happened to the one under it and so on like Dominoes all the way to the ground.
2007-10-02 02:07:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Easy. These planes were carrying huge amounts of jet fuel, which burns hot enough to soften even steel.
These planes were recently off the ground, meaning they were nearly full of this jet fuel.
Further, the buildings were not designed to handle such a strike of such a large airplane. The Twin Towers were only designed to hold the impact of a nearly-empty 727. The designers never considered the possibility of a fully loaded 747.
Further yet, the damage was quite local at first, but a small weakness can lead to large scale collapse. Any person who has set up a domino knock-down layout knows it's possible to branch a chain of dominos, and as such for one knocked down domino to start a chain reaction which knocks down millions.
And let's see your documentation on 5000 jewish workers being absent, hmmm?
2007-10-02 02:04:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Oh, boy, here we go again.
1. the allegation that 5,000 jewish workers were absent is false - it's a myth - a lie perpetuate by people who hate Jews.
2. Nobody heard "bombs." They heard noises that were the result of the building collapsing.
3. How can a plane destroy the tallest building? Easily. By smashing into it at 600+ miles per hour.
2007-10-02 02:03:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 2⤋
Popular Mechanics magazine did an article, a book, and a TV show debunking all of these theories.
It is not true that 5000 Jewish workers were absent that day. It is a lie.
2007-10-02 02:06:10 · answer #6 · answered by Randy G 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I hate people like you. You bring us all down a level. I can't believe we're of the same species.
The biggest claim that those retard conspiracy theorists have is that jet fuel burns at a lower temperature than what steel melts at. House fires burn at higher temperatures than what jet fuel burns at. That is a minimum temperature for combustion. Given the right conditions (lots of fuel and plenty of oxygen) temperatures will reach many many times higher than the melting point of steel. It doesn't even have to melt the steel, when you heat steel to a certain temperature it changes configuration of sorts, it goes from hardened cementite or martenized steel to austenite, which is very malleable. On top of this when you have a large temperature differential in solids they tend to become highly stressed. Create enough stress in an object it breaks. You can test this for yourself. Place some combustible material in a glass plate ( I did this over the 4th of july to prove a point) I emptied a bunch of those paper sparklers into an ash tray. Ignite it and you'll shatter the ash tray, This is because the center of the ash tray heated more than the outer part, creating stress, shattering the entire thing. If the top part of a tall building breaks and collapses down onto the lower parts, this has a domino effect bringing the entire thing down.
Anthony B: Where did you come up with that? Got a degree in metallurgy? Perhaps materials science? Please get a vasectemy before you spread your disease any further.
2007-10-02 02:05:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
First of all, change your tin foil.
Secondly, as much as I would like to believe that 9/11 was a mass conspiracy, I can't. Mostly because of how badly Iraq has been bungled. The proportions of a conspiracy as large as 9/11 are almost inconceivable, and to think that nobody would have slipped up and blown their cover in 6+ years since then is, as well.
9/11 was a sucker punch.
2007-10-02 02:03:42 · answer #8 · answered by bamidélé 4 · 7⤊ 1⤋
i've got laughed at why the fly on the wall is being so nosy. What the fly on the wal thinks of what I do,while the fly makes that is life with the aid of mountain climbing on excrement and feeding on that is laughable in assessment.
2016-11-07 01:06:57 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
seems english is not your native tounge and why blame the jews?
oh right your a muslim
and yes jews were in the building when it collapsed
and yes a plane and the subsequent fire can weaken the metal causing the top to come crashing down and destroying the building
2007-10-02 02:04:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋