2007-10-02 01:02:41 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No, we should ignore them until they have nukes and take out half the planet.
It would be a mistake to invade. Kind of like how we thought iraq had WMD's which lead to where we are at now.
2007-10-02 01:06:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Of course not!
I've heard from friends in America (and see on fox news) how the US media is dishonestly and maliciously repeatedly going on about what a huge and imminent threat Iran is - this is just rubbish - look for it on a news channel anywhere else in the world and you'll find nothing.
I don't know why they need such a pretense of engaging in another of what they call 'pre-emptive wars' - I mean 9/11 was a horrific tragedy but one of the logical holes in the argument that it was an inside job seems to be that it didn't really offer an excuse - Invading Iraq still wasn't justified so why bother at all? World Trade Centre 7 is something I think about a lot. It went down at about 5:30 on 9/11, no planes crashed in to it, and there were only a few minor fires. The 9/11 commission report didn't mention it at all. I was always offended by the conspiracy theories but I'm having trouble explaining the inconsistencies in the official version of events.
Why are some people saying the US has a right to bomb their military sites? Does the rest of a world have a right to bomb the US's military sites? Are they responsible enough to be policeman of the world? Who guards the guards? America is the real rogue state.
2007-10-02 08:08:24 · answer #2 · answered by Leviathan 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
At this time, there are more than 600 Iranian missiles pointed at Israel. Yesterday, Iran announced that if EITHER Israel OR America attacked Iran, it would immediately bomb 170 US targets. Israeli and US intelligence confirm that North Korea tried to ship nuclear material to Syria a few months ago (it was destroyed by the IDF); Syria and Iran are now working on an advanced chemical "defense system" (read that as: "an advanced Jew-killing system") together. While working on that system in June, a missile armed with chemicals (including Sarin) exploded, killing "dozens" of Iranian military advisers and Syrian weapons developers. Iran's president has repeatedly stated that he wants to wipe Israel and the US off the map. Iran's nuclear program is very near to producing enough nuclear material to make several bombs.
I think the circumstances speak for themselves. Yes, Israel and the US should invade Iran; over the past few months, France's new President has voiced support for this approach, so it's likely that country would participate, as would Great Britain. I am a pacifist -- I really don't believe in solving problems by using unnecessary violence. However, Iran has forced our hand. "Those who do not learn from history are destined to repeat it."
Unfortunately, the US government is full of neo-Neville Chamberlains who believe we can actually "talk" with these crazy people. If we don't take action soon, our own government will cause the deaths of millions in the US. Anyone who thinks the US can't -- or won't -- be attacked has their head in the sand.
Unfortunately, Russia is Iran's biggest ally. This whole scenario seems to indicate God is setting the stage for a fulfillment of Ezekiel 38 and 39. May God have mercy on us all.
2007-10-02 08:22:51 · answer #3 · answered by Suzanne: YPA 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
When Satan put spill on the people this is how they think.
Hasn't US learned any thing from invading Iraq?
What's the excuse? Iranians are trying to make a bomb.
Doesn't US have the largest number of Atom Boms?
When will Americans learn? When this world will end.
Atom bomb kills the victims instantly. But the oppressors will
burn in hell over and over and over. Meaning each time their skin will burn with sensory nerves and they will stop feeling the pain, angels of hell will renew their skins to make them feel the pain. Process will continue for ever on to such killers.
Believing on Jesus won't do any thing. May be that is why
Christians stick to this belief that Jesus has already
forgiven them. Can there be more stupid concept than this?
US is no more morally and ethically a super power.
2007-10-02 08:48:49 · answer #4 · answered by majeed3245 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, the United States should not invade Iran for simple fact: the U.S. cannot afford another invasion, much less occupation, of a hostile population. Also, it would be both illegal and immoral.
2007-10-02 12:35:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The thing that gets me is that the fighting has been going on over there for a long long time. How egotistical are we that we think that, just because we say so, this is going to go away and Iran will live happily ever after.
2007-10-02 08:21:59 · answer #6 · answered by soupcan48 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. They should let the United Nations attend to the conflict of Iran's nuclear technology.
Invading Iraq was a mistake, but it doesn't change the fact that Saddam Hussein's Regime needed to be brought down. Hussein was a terrorist dictator to his own people. He died because of his crimes against humanity.
There are other leaders that need to be dethroned as well. However, I believe these things should be done by the United Nations. Leaders who kill their own people for their own illogical unjustifiable reasons are wrong. As a planet of humans, we need to dispel oppression of it's people.
2007-10-02 08:20:04 · answer #7 · answered by Soul Shaper 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Iran has three times as many people and three times as many mountains as Iraq (look at a map).
Our toops are stretched thin to the limit now.
It would be a disaster.
2007-10-02 08:09:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Invade - no
Bomb key sites, naval blockade - yep
2007-10-02 08:07:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because we need another pitiless quagmire of a war to drain public money away from unimportant endeavors like health care, education, and hunger.
2007-10-02 08:08:43 · answer #10 · answered by atheist 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋