English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The earth is billions of years old,,Noahs flood was the 2nd flood, Genesis1-God hovered over the face of the deep, a good book by Charles Capps,,,called -The World That Was.

2007-10-01 20:08:27 · 8 answers · asked by Inou 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

No jesting! Adam and Eve were still created as Gods word says,cavemen were of another race of beings,guess you'd have to read the book.also with the 1st flood all those cavemen were destroyed,,they were an evil breed and God started fresh as He did with Noah!

2007-10-01 20:16:06 · update #1

8 answers

We've been taught that the earth is billions of years old, when in fact there is no accurate way of measuring time with our current standards. Regardless of the age of the Earth it is a fact that "cavemen" walked the earth at some point in time, however, I do not believe that "cavemen" was a species which preexisted modern man. The fossil record has been wrongly taught to us and many finding have been left out because they contradict what science has neatly packaged for all people to take at face value. People have found objects from time period of what we would consider recent history along with fossils of dinosaurs or in rock layers which date back "millions" of years before they could have been made (for example man-made pots have been found in the same layers as dinosaurs). An interesting theory about cavemen in that they were not a precursor for men but a species which co-existed at the same time as men. Just like we have different races in modern times (Africans, Asians, Europeans), there was at some point a race of people which we now call "cavemen". Think about it this way, let's pretend that currently there were no people on Earth of Asian decent (think about all the Asian characteristics ex. slanted eyes, facial features etc.) and we found the remains of an Asian society, their artwork and their skeletons. We would immediately believe that they were at some point a link in our evolutionary process. Scientist would formulate all sort of stories that would fit our modern view of our history, when in fact all it was, was a race that died out before us...

2007-10-01 20:30:31 · answer #1 · answered by Moe Hawk 2 · 0 0

I think it's very likely, that the book of Genesis is saying that people as we know them today, are a new spirit, bound to an old flesh. The New Testament also deals with a new branch, grafted to an old tree stump. Literal interpretations of the Bible disregard much of it's message, at least as much atheistic opinions stop, when apparent contradictions are found.

I don't think Cain married a cave-woman though. He probably
hooked up with a fully evolve human.

(ok, maybe she did have one eyebrow, that went all the way accross her forehead, but his forehead was a little different too)

2007-10-01 20:29:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

probably in the time frame although I find it extremely doubtful the story has even a semblance of reality but is merely fictional or fantasy for other purposes.
Not that this following statement should be this way it is often true even today:
Lucius Annaeus Seneca "the Younger," Roman stoic philosopher, writer, and politician (4-65).
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful."

2007-10-01 20:18:21 · answer #3 · answered by dogpatch USA 7 · 0 0

No. The problem of archeology and paleontology is the effect of the flood of Noah.

Before the flood there were many people and great civilizations. We find remnants of them and because they are in lower strata and therefore older. Paleontologists (evolutionists who want 1)to have their research funded by bureaucrats who do not believe in God and 2) want to get published in scientific journals) say these layers are much older that they really are. There is ample evidence in the Americas of extensive civilizations that just suddenly ceased to exist.
To the common ancestor of man and apes(not monkeys no serious scientist postulates a common ancestor for man and monkeys except that we are all mammals) our DNA is very similar to the apes except one of their chromosomes is broken into two parts, Those two parts are homologous to our one chromosome. We are the children of a common ancestor cromagnon man.

2007-10-01 20:12:04 · answer #4 · answered by Bullfrog21 6 · 0 2

It's kinda hard to proof huh?

As for me, I'm still waiting.. if there any chances that Adam and Eve are Cavemen ..of **** sapient sapience of course

2007-10-01 20:12:44 · answer #5 · answered by Abu Syawali 2 · 0 1

No...IN THE BEGINNING! Enough said!

nfd♥
Lover of my Lord Jesus Christ &
Believer of the Holy Bible

2007-10-01 23:40:05 · answer #6 · answered by fishineasy™ 7 · 0 0

surely you jest - if that were true, adam and eve would have been born not created.

2007-10-01 20:12:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

SIMPLY (No)

2007-10-01 20:11:33 · answer #8 · answered by . 7 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers