A better solution would be for America / Eoropeans to stop burning Iranian oil in their gas guzzling cars.......Stop being a W**ker.
2007-10-01 12:51:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anchor Cranker 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Brilliant idea. No doubt Georgie's minions will be working on a weapons of mass destruction / ready to wipe out the world in 45 mins style deposition to the UN for approval to take them all out soon for just that reason.
Probably no more far fetched than whatever stupid idea everyone swallows for when the tanks do roll into Iran.
2007-10-01 12:54:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ring of Uranus 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
in case you look on the technological know-how those scientists say are evidence of anthropogenic international warming, such because of fact the present improve of annual CO2 atmospheric concentration being approximately 15gt on the same time as anthropogenic emissions are 30gt, a shrink in outbound radiation at CO2 absorption wavelengths, an improve at those comparable wavelengths, the upward push in carbon-12 whilst in comparison with carbon-13 interior the ambience, the lowering pH of the oceans, etc you notice precisely what the reality is. i've got asked time and time returned what ought to the 'organic clarification' for those be (nonetheless i even have no concept how they'll say that the each year upward push of 15gt of CO2 is organic as quickly as we emit 30gt) and the solutions deniers regularly provide are something appropriate to Al Gore, the climate has replaced interior the previous, traditionally CO2 follows temp upward push, etc... yet they look so beneficial of their claims that the sunlight is the reason of international warming. To state this they'd desire to thoroughly write off the greenhouse result and say that atmospheric CO2, and therefor another gas, can no longer soak up warmth. quite what they'd desire to coach is quantum physics is in errors and to coem up with a possible clarification.
2016-12-17 14:34:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
To answer your NONE military question:
No far better for the U.S. to sign up to the KYOTO Agreement. And clean up their factories which are causing so much damage to the climate.
2007-10-01 19:00:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by conranger1 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes lets face it Iran is the global king of carbon emmisions. Those evil bastards are destroying our planet.
2007-10-05 01:28:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Arsie G 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
because if they take out power plants the iran ppl are not going to have power and not all iran people are in the war or fighting
2007-10-01 12:45:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by keke 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't care about the man-made-global-warming myth. But Destroying Iran will save us from a nuclear blast in NYC..
We have a choice...Bomb Iran...or get nuked. What do you think we should do?
2007-10-01 15:35:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
In that regard, how are Irainian power plants different from any others?
2007-10-01 12:45:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
that is just a wild rumor..started by you..
2007-10-01 12:45:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
yes, very soon!
2007-10-01 12:45:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋