English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Here was my previous question on God's intention with these creatures that are so similar in form and intellect to humans...

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ApauKTGL.o_UD3Nrx5BBFR_d7BR.;_ylv=3?qid=20071001142705AAzdpnc

I'll paraphrase some of the responses...

1) Neanderthals didn't have spirits, so they were only animals
2) They never existed
3) Neanderthals were all disabled humans
4) Some of the groups from Babel lived in caves until they got arthritis and diseased
5) Neanderthal skeletons are a hodge-podge of various animal's bones
6) Result of demonic experiments

Anybody else have some input?

I'm not really happy with the answers thus far... mainly because we know they existed and that they weren't human or a variation of human (I guess nobody bothered to read the two links I had).

Actually the first answer I paraphrased was the only real answer I got... even though it didn't answer my question: What was God's intention with them!

2007-10-01 11:24:18 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

4 answers

I think Neanderthals make "spiritual" people nervous. If you let one extra-human species into the club, what's to keep all the others out? The fact is, there is some tenuous evidence that the species had some sort of spiritual understanding. Considerable amounts of flower pollen (and therefore flowers) have been found in some Neanderthal graves. We can't say for sure what its purpose was but it seems to hint at some sort of departure ritual, which would imply some kind of belief in a "soul".

Since there's no mention of Neanderthals in the Bible, and since we don't know how they died out, this throws into question our specialness and our own survival. If God didn't take care of them, are we sure he's taking care of us? And of Neanderthals had primitive souls, then what might gorillas, chimps, baboons, dolphins, etc. have? Is it a gradual development? What exactly makes "humans" different?

Headache city. Best not to think about it.

2007-10-01 11:30:36 · answer #1 · answered by skepsis 7 · 3 0

Scientifically they were a separate species, every bit as capable as we are. I have read that they were too peaceful and lacked our innate brutality. We overran their populations and either killed them all off, or they were assimilated with the human population through breeding. This being said, you will have me perusing the science section tonight at Barnes and Noble for more info. Good questions.

2007-10-01 11:42:00 · answer #2 · answered by Shawn B 7 · 0 0

Sorry approximately your Dad. New converts are continuously the worst, identical to reformed alcoholics or humans that stop smoking. But, sure in keeping with Christianity, every body "sins". No exceptions. Besides the secular regulation, which applies to every body, Christians have all their possess regulations that you just "sin" while you holiday the ones. For starters, there may be swearing, alcohol (in a few sects), any sort of intercourse external marriage, Mormons don't drink, smoke, or use caffeine (even though I've recognized Mormons that do all 3) and so on. However, as mentioned, consuming a hamburger is a "sin" in opposition to the Hindu "gods" and I'm certain Hindus do matters which can be "sins" in opposition to the Christian "god". Atheists and agnostics like myself are not able to "sin" on account that there's no PROVEN "god" to "sin" in opposition to. If you are not able to uncover any cogent purpose to consider in a "god", how are you able to "sin"? Blessings in your Journey!

2016-09-05 14:00:47 · answer #3 · answered by kerper 4 · 0 0

They were human. End of story

2014-06-10 09:29:10 · answer #4 · answered by ? 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers