Does the perfectly unevolved Babel fish disprove the existence of God?

Question

Now it is such a bizarrely improbable coincidence that anything so mind-bogglingly useful could have evolved purely by chance that some thinkers have chosen to see it as a final and clinching proof of the non-existence of God. The argument goes something like this:
"I refuse to prove that I exist," says God, "for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing."

"But," says Man, "the Babel fish is a dead giveaway isn't it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves that you exist, and so therefore, by your own arguments, you don't. Q.E.D."

"Oh dear," says God, "I hadn't thought of that," and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic.

"Oh, that was easy," says Man, and for an encore goes on to prove that black is white and gets himself killed on the next zebra crossing.

Jeez everyone knows it's Hitchhiker's.

Answer 1

We apologize for the inconvenience

Answer 2

Well that's interesting, where does it say that without proof there is a god, and when there is proof there is a god, because then, Christians should stop trying to prove God, since if they ever find proof he goes poof, right?

Answer 3

Rest in peace, Douglas Adams, even though people are posting your work without giving you credit.

Answer 4

I won't panic and I know where my towel is.

Answer 5

So long, and thanks for all the fish.