2007-10-01 09:15:39 · 12 answers · asked by shyfello 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Because even in centuries before Christ, Pharisees and Sadducee's were not teaching God's Name nor were they using it.
They made it out to be something superstitious and in a weaken spiritual state, the nation followed these false leaders course of action.
How grateful we can be for the fact that Jesus restored Jehovah's Name by using it when he preached the Good News of God's Kingdom!
I personal am grateful fro the New World's Translation of the Holy Scriptures for replacing Jehovah's Name in the Bible making it very clear which God or god the bible is talking about.
2007-10-01 10:26:21 · answer #1 · answered by Here I Am 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
The concept of a single God is a relatively recent one. There are 27 Gods named in the Bible, and countless passages where a jealous God gets upset about people worshipping another God.
2007-10-01 23:29:34 · answer #2 · answered by Ben Gunn 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in accordance to the Trinity doctrine, Jesus is God, yet a separate man or woman from the daddy. The doctrine teaches that there are 3 separate persons -- the daddy, The Son and The Holy Spirit -- who all contain one God. If this coaching is genuine, there should not be any scripture interior the Bible that portrays Jesus as an entity separate and distinctive from God -- separate and distinctive from the daddy, particular; yet no longer separate and distinctive from God. by using way of assessment, word that there is not any scripture interior the Bible that portrays the daddy as a separate and distinctive entity from God. it would be completely ridiculous, complicated, pointless and contradictory for the Bible to many times communicate over with Jesus as an entity separate and distinctive from God, if Jesus is God. however the scriptures you quoted do basically that. many times they communicate of Jesus being on the the terrific option hand of, no longer the daddy, yet God, thus contradicting the Trinity doctrine. as a results of fact the Bible is God's be attentive to fact, the undeniable fact that it so normally contradicts the Trinity doctrine can propose basically one ingredient -- the Trinity doctrine is fake. (John 17:17) i think -- as a results of fact i've got faith maximum individuals have a minimum of a modicum of intelligence -- that deep down, many Trinitarians understand that the doctrine is fake. yet delight and/or a prefer to slot in with the 'Christian' crowd compels them to play alongside, pretending or convincing themselves that they suspect it. Many are thus in a state of denial approximately this falsehood. basically look at how they answer the question. Many won't even address the particular subject you have raised, head on -- as a results of fact they are in a position to't. Their basically decision is to forget approximately it and quote different so reported as 'info texts'. that's no longer as a results of fact they lack intelligence. that's as a results of fact there is not any credible and passable argument to disprove what the Bible -- God's authoritative be attentive to fact -- very blatantly shows.
2016-10-10 03:03:01 · answer #3 · answered by hussaini 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you sure you mean Rev 18:19??
19"They will throw dust on their heads, and with weeping and mourning cry out:
" 'Woe! Woe, O great city,
where all who had ships on the sea
became rich through her wealth!
In one hour she has been brought to ruin!"
2007-10-02 04:50:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I looked up Rev.. 18:19 and it doesn't have anything re: LORD or the Personal name of God in it.
Are you sure you have the right scripture?
2007-10-01 09:32:58 · answer #5 · answered by mary 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Because they don't acknowledge his personal name that is found in King James Bible at Psalm 83:18 because really they cannot see him as real. We dont call someone we love by a title but their personal name. What is the first thing we say to new parents - we ask the name. Why cant we call God his personal name of JEHOVAH
2007-10-01 09:56:53 · answer #6 · answered by Purple triangle 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
The thing is, copyist of the Greek Manuscripts removed the name of YHWH in the New Testament. His personal name (YHWH) was replaced with Lord and God.
2007-10-01 09:23:46 · answer #7 · answered by VMO 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
18:19 And they cast dust on their heads, and cried, weeping and wailing, saying, Alas, alas that great city, wherein were made rich all that had ships in the sea by reason of her costliness! for in one hour is she made desolate.
??????????????
2007-10-01 09:22:50 · answer #8 · answered by Vinni and beer 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't know why translators change things I think they had to make changes to get a copyrite (the newer versions).
2007-10-01 09:20:35 · answer #9 · answered by sisterzeal 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The personal name of the Lord is IAM or Jesus Christ
2007-10-01 09:19:21 · answer #10 · answered by tebone0315 7 · 1⤊ 5⤋