2007-10-01 01:56:30 · 15 answers · asked by Chickoon 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Languages
It's not a Londoner thing! We say it all the time too and i'm in Ireland. So basically that's that LOL
2007-10-01 02:05:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Basically, all londoners have say basically, like, ten times in a conversation, cos, basically, its a sign of a weak vocabulary.
Annoying isn't it? The best part? Basically isn't even in the dictionary. Basic, basical, basics, yes. Basically, no.
2007-10-01 02:00:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Basically, your question is basically flawed, because basically us Londoners basically only use basically when basically necessary and not when we feel like it, basically. Basically I wish questions like this were more basically put, so that basically, us Londoners could basically understand them. Basically, the answer to your question is basically never.
2007-10-01 07:43:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i do no longer say the pledge for 2 factors. the universal one is considering of the "...under god..." section. As an atheist, i do no longer think of I would desire to would desire to furnish an oath to despite i don't experience in, it does no longer make experience. the finished argument that the rustic was once primary under god is total nonsense, there may well be trouble-free evidence. there's a ideal away quote from George Washington stating that the rustic became as quickly as no longer based under god and there was once devoid of doubt no purpose of it. My 2d purpose is considering that i assume the flag and the pledge are the two nationalistic innovations. announcing the pledge to me is like asserting you think of you're united states of america is state-of-the-artwork and that each and every person others are inferior. no person rather understand if it is going to be switched over or no longer. As for asserting it, in basic terms do no longer. you do no longer legally have have been given to stand, yet whilst your instructor provide you with a coarse time for now no longer status in basic terms stand. now no longer for the pledge, yet to coach savour on your associates. if your instructor makes you're saying it, wrestle it. bypass to the universal or some ingredient you will desire to do. it rather is unlawful for them to make you're saying it.
2016-12-28 08:43:22 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh my gosh,my daughters always avin a go at me for saying basically in front of every sentence,it's a hard habit to break much like those that say "no offence but....."When basically they do mean to cause offence!
2007-10-01 02:02:18 · answer #5 · answered by snikleback 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it`s something especially affiliated to Londoners,but I tell you what irritates me for some reason, when you ask someone something and they reply "sorry".
2007-10-01 02:17:49 · answer #6 · answered by Gary Crant 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
0001 111 0000 01 000111111 1100 011101111011111110 0001111111
'basically!'
2007-10-01 02:19:01 · answer #7 · answered by Lindum 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
haha snikleba... are you talking about me .
yes well basically the amount of times i`ve said basically today is none ------oops
2007-10-01 02:17:08 · answer #8 · answered by keny 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Have you ever listened to L.B.C radio show at 10.00am with James O'Brien as he has band the word fro his show and callers, its really funny!
2007-10-01 02:12:14 · answer #9 · answered by Kelly B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Basically, loads!
2007-10-01 02:50:58 · answer #10 · answered by GrahamH 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋