Is it worth to continue US troops in Iraq still? even after the death of Saddam and his men?

Question

Iraq got it's own destiny. Whatever happened has happened. Now there is not much meaning in keeping forces, I thought personally.

Answer 1

Grab money, grab oil, this is an open secret which is behind the aim of US forces to stay in iraq forcibly. It is clear that US attacked on iraq taking lame excuse of having mass destruction, chemical weapons with sadaam, which weapon did sadaam seize from iraq, nothing........why the rest of world is not holding bush responsible for the masscare done in iraq, why bush is not hanged for killing thousands of innocent people in iraq whether muslim or non-muslim, but behind this entire tale is an open secret i.e oil oil and oil............i suggest shortcut way to iraqian people.........do one thing........burn all the oil stations, you people would get the freedem from the devil bush.......

Answer 2

Yeah, troops should leave Iraq. I'm sure none of the insurgents would take advantage of the situation and the resulting civil war certainly wouldn't cause the death tolls to explode from their already untolerable levels.

Iraq is perfectly capable of taking care of itself with out international assistance.

Heh, and they say sarcasm doesn't work on the internet.

Whether you feel the war is just or not, demanding troop withdrawls now would be a death sentence to a war ravaged and suffering country.

Answer 3

Well....

I just don't think so. They said that their present there is to recover the condition of Iraq. The Iraqi rebels actually want to fight the US Army with an unconventional warfare.

I think US Army won't be able to defeat the Iraqi Rebel with such a conventional weight.

From the history of Indonesia also, our Indonesian army had used their tactics during the Physic Revolution 1945-1949.

I think, they use tactics of hit and run tactics.

They are based in Kabul and then attacked US Army base in Kabul (example). After they done the attack successfully, they won't hide in Kabul again. They will find a new base in another city example in Baghdad. Then, they attacked again US Army base in Baghdad than move to another place, and so on, and so on

I think the best way the US had to do is retreat or cut their recruitment line. That will be the most effective way to get it done.

Answer 4

you don't build a base the size of Vatican City unless you plan on staying for a good long while. We will never leave, now that we have what amounts to a huge police station right in the middle of oil-rich Iraq. You think we'd abandon that? Yeah, right.

Answer 5

No. You are right, US troops should leave a sovereign state of Iraq. Let it develop its own. Otherwise any time same thing may happens to US.

Answer 6

I am from iran and I think us troops should be in iraq just as south korea , if they remain in iraq surely terrorists would be tired and peace governs ..
if us troops be in iraq , the american think and view can be transited to middle east people..
and i think it is good..

Answer 7

Why do people keep asking political questions in a military forum? This forum is here to help answer military related questions or assist people with questions concerning military family members or to assist people in thier decision to join the military.

Answer 8

i think the main aim for all that fighting was curbing strength of terrorism... Iraq and Afghanistan were safe heavens for the terrorists...
it is better known to the US administration... as to what is going to be their next step...

Answer 9

Leave iraq! or face the consequenses!

Answer 10

Sure there is....we need to make a lot of money at our solders expense. Solders can always be replaced that is the NEW american way.