English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

On that date April 12th 2003, al-Ghazali and his family sheltered in their house as a fierce street battle erupted in his neighborhood. In the midst of the fighting, he noticed that the Americans had called up an oddly configured tank. Then to his amazement the tank suddenly let loose a blinding stream of what seemed like fire and lightning, engulfing a large passenger bus and three automobiles. Within seconds the bus had become semi-molten, sagging "like a wet rag" as he put it. He said the bus rapidly melted under this withering blast,shrinking until it was a twisted blob about the dimensions of a VW bug. As if that were not bizarre enough,he explicitly describes seeing numerous human bodies shriveled to the size of newborn babies.Cox report that former USSR once was deeply involved in exploring high-powered electromagnetic weapons, but now Russia is no longer pursuing them. Other nations believed to be conducting research and arming these arsenals are China,Great Britain and France.

2007-09-30 21:03:36 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law Enforcement & Police

18 answers

i have prime swampland in florida,
you interested?

2007-09-30 21:14:48 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 1 0

You've posted this 9 different times over the past 2 days. If you can't get it through your head that:
1. No one believes you without a link.
2. The power source required would be too massive to transport.
3. Nobody cares....

2007-10-03 02:02:37 · answer #2 · answered by Cookies Anyone? 5 · 1 0

those weapons are actually not new. They do require rather a lot of capability. i might have faith they could make a tank that should do some thing like that that's defined yet i might think of the style and length of the attack may well be short because of the capability standards. perhaps you will desire to circulate and coach that guy a plasma torch and notice if that became what he observed.

2016-12-14 04:31:21 · answer #3 · answered by isador 4 · 0 0

You really need to research things like this before you ask the question. If they used it once why aren't they still using it. I would and it would resolve some of the problem over there a lot faster!

2007-10-01 00:26:45 · answer #4 · answered by d3midway semi-retired 7 · 0 0

Ok,This look good for the next Iran war,This terror machine will be the nightmare of all terrorists. They will have no chance for fighting the mighty US army armed with this secret tank,the first in modern warfare,They can run but no place to hide,and they will be incinerated in no time.

Similarly look at our stealthky B2 bombers which contribute to our decisive winning of the earler war in Iraqi to liberate Kuwait,they had already flying secretly in the early 1980s,but media does not know of its existence,It was unveiled not until just moment before the first Gulf War in 1991!

I suspect our army is hiding this secret from the media.The reason is not known,but i believe at least a battalion of them will be ready for use in our next coming war to create SHOCK AND AWE II.

2007-10-01 01:32:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Sounds like BS to me. Not the technology, but the reporting of using it. We only unleash new weapons when necessary. When we do unleash new weapons, we tend to brag about it. Iraq doesn't provide a need for such weapons.

2007-09-30 21:09:33 · answer #6 · answered by Chef 6 · 1 0

You've already posted this one, why do it again? As I said before, this "report" was first posted in 2003 and is totally unsubstantiated - it is probably just scaremongering. Where is your proof that anything like this has happened, and what are your sources?

2007-09-30 21:12:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Possible but unlikely that it would be used unless they could confirm that the bus contained enemy combatants. If I had to place a bet on this I doubt its true. Who knows what the guy saw. If Dan Rather said he saw this it might be more credible.

2007-09-30 21:18:25 · answer #8 · answered by Beertha 2 · 0 1

Makes a good story for the National Enquirer. Call them up, and they will be happy to "research" it and post the story, complete with "actual pictures".

2007-09-30 21:56:35 · answer #9 · answered by Fred C 7 · 1 1

How many times are you going to post this idiotic delusional babble?...go nite nite before mommie finds out you're playing "Keyboard Hero" with her PC and whips your a*s like a redheaded stepchild...

2007-09-30 21:30:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

more conspiracy theories?

go buy a copy of Catcher in the Rye.

I'll take that tinfoil hat if he doesn't!

2007-09-30 21:12:08 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers