I mean seriously, microsoft had over 5 years to develop vista and this is the crap they released. Vista is like the works OS EVER. What were they doing in those 5 years? Everyone should demand a refund!
2007-09-30 02:07:39 · 5 answers · asked by Bossman 2 in Computers & Internet ➔ Software
i have to agree with you,nothing but crap.No-one wants to know about it,you ask for help and as soon as you mention its Vista,they say why did you get it..im at a loss and out of pocket.
2007-09-30 02:13:53 · answer #1 · answered by shrebee 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, it is going to restoration each and every thing that's incorrect with Vista (and Microsoft too) in case you reside in Cloud Cuckoo Land. regrettably we don't stay there so we are pressured to handle actuality and the actuality is that each and each provider %. and each patch that fixes problems with undesirable code additionally has a tendency to create extra issues using fact which you land up bobbing up conflicts with latest code. the superb element to do of direction is to place in writing sturdy code at the beginning which they curiously did no longer do with Vista so this version of Vista is particularly a lot a misplaced reason till they parse the entire kernel and discover the themes and fasten them there and that they ok might do this so there is an rather sturdy threat that we are going to see a abode windows Vista 2nd version which you will might desire to purchase of direction at finished retail cost like they did with abode windows ninety 5 and ninety 8. the two that or they're going to abandon the entire OS like they did with abode windows ME and sell the hot abode windows due out in overdue 2008 or early 2009. to respond to you question conveniently, No it won't restoration Vista. Vista is in simple terms a foul working equipment.
2016-10-20 08:59:44 · answer #2 · answered by thibaud 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hi, why don't u be more specific in the problem it gives u? I have used Windows Vista a lot and never got any problems. Windows Vista also has some new security features that previously were only in Unix and Linux.
Good Luck!
2007-09-30 02:20:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's called planned obsolescence. They had great dreams back then, continuously threw out lots of them over the years, and the finished product is just re-packaging of what XP already had solved, except for the new visual I'm told. And this eats up so much memory it's almost worthless.
2007-09-30 02:18:42 · answer #4 · answered by snvffy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think because it is new and there will be some problems with it not discovered
2007-09-30 02:12:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋