I'll ask again, since 1. I did not get any answer that even match what evolutionists believe, they contradicted themselves, and 2. I have not been able to keep up with the answers, seeing as I have been fighting a flu and taking care of my daughter who gave it to me, so here we go again.
Questions for Evolutionists?
1.Where did the space for the universe come from?
2.Where did matter come from?
3.Where did the laws of the universe come from (gravity, inertia, etc)?
4.How did matter get so perfectly organized?
5.Where did the energy come from to do all the organizing?
6.When, where, why, and how did life come from dead matter?
7.When, where, why and how did life learn to reproduce itself?
8.With what did the first cell capable of sexual reproduction reproduce?
Remeber though that Atoms can not form matter when even scientists believe that before the so called big bang there was nothing. NOTHING, so nothing can come from nothing. Please know what you are talking about 1st.
2007-09-29
17:32:24
·
14 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Actually this question does belong here. Evolutionists and scientists believe in the same things, that the world could not have possibly been creted by God. The fact is, that evolution and big bang go hand in hand, ask an evolutionist how the world was created and they will tell you that the big bang did it. Scientists and evolutionists are in agreement that there had to be some other explaination as to how the world was formed.
And the answer to all the questions is this. There is no answer.
1. If there was nothing as scientists would have you believe then there was no space to hold the elements needed for the big bang to occur.
2.It came from nowhere, matter can not form where there is no life. If matter can come from nothing then there is something higher than God out there.
3.Read up on the long drawn out ever changing theory of big bang and and world creation and you will see that there is no explaination as to the laws of the universe, but yet it had to come from somewhere, right?
and so it goes withthe rest of the answers. There are no answers to them, they are trick questions, because the top scientists in teh world can not answer these questions, it is these questions and more that the "THEORY" of evolution and the "THEORY" of the big bang have not been made facts, because scientists can not accoutn for matter that was not there to create a reaction of things that did not exist, if they could be answered then science could safely say that they have imperical proof of the big bang and evolution. But don't take my word for it research if for yourselves.
2007-09-29 20:15:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by habib J 1
·
0⤊
3⤋
1. Unknown. The universe may be the space itself. "Into" implies that whatever is outside the universe has an "into".
2. The high energy photons of the photon era.
3. The laws are just the interactions of the components of the universe.
4. There is no perfect organization.
5. Organization does not require energy. Ice releases energy as it crystalizes.
6 & 7. Reproduction is a defining property. Life came to be because molecules capable of some degree of self replication would eventually become predominant.
8. Sexual reproduction started as a means of reassorting genes during replication. Many organisms are capable of sexual and asexual replication. Male and female (or even more sexes) are just restrictions on the crossing interactions.
Scientists never said that the big bang came from nothing. Please learn something instead of cutting and pasting the same old, overused questions.
2007-09-29 17:57:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by novangelis 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Evolution does not deal with where the universe came from and where the first life came from. Evolution deals with how one sort of animal changes a little bit with each generation until it become a new species.
As for where the universe, matter, and life all came from: I have NO IDEA whatsoever. I agree that the Big bang theory doesn't seem to make sense because how could something suddenly come from nothing. But.... just because I don't know where the universe came from and how life got started, that is NO REASON to jump to a conclusion that Christianity or any religion's story is true. It's like if you were a detective trying to solve a murder but there was no clues as to who did it, no witnesses, and no one with a motive that you can find... would you just suddenly jump to the conclusion that Big Foot followed the victim home from the supermarket and killed him because Big Foot hates the color orange, which the victim was wearing. And that big Foot lives in a magical world of Big Foots that can only be entered through a tunnel in the Forest somewhere. And that Big Foot will strike again and kill anyone that says the words "Slim Jim", because those words represent evil to Big Foot?
Of course you wouldn't. Because that's such a giant leap from the evidence. Just because I don't know where the universe came from doesn't mean that God, heaven, hell, angels, the devil, Adam and Eve, and magical miracles are all real. Give me a break!
2007-09-29 17:47:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by egn18s 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Science doesn't have all the answers. But that doesn't mean that by default a supernatural being did it all.
Humans are uncomfortable living in a world where they can't explain every last detail (hence all your questions?). If solid answers are not available, then people will fall on religion to explain what they do not understand. That's why there are countless religions.
I'm content to say "I don't know". People talk like religion and science are polar opposites. They're not though. They were both created by humans to attempt to explain why the world is the way it is.
Science is still scary to people because it doesn't promise an afterlife. Death is scary to humans, so religion and its promise of eternal life is a warmer alternative.
Either way, I'm not going to worry about it, because I doubt any "answers" will ever be available.
2007-09-29 17:58:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Matt 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
1. There is no such thing as an 'evolutionist.
2. The Theory of Evolution has absolutely nothing to do with the origin of the Universe.
3. Just because a person does not believe in god(s) does not automatically make them a physicist, paleo-biologist, archaeologist, cosmologist or geneticist.
5. You are getting conflicting answers because they are just people opinions. We are not all bloody scientists, we just don't believe in god(s).
Atheist.
2007-09-29 17:43:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Well, i'll pose a question back at you. What do most of those questions have to do with evolution?
Evolution does not deal with the basic/molecular origins of life. It merely deals with how we have slowly changed from simple organisms to complex ones.
Scientists actually believe that the universe has always existed, and has just continually been expanding and contracting. Thus there was never a 'nothingness'. I, myself, am not too sure about how this works, but maybe you could ask a physicist about this.
And another question. Why don't you ask this in a science section?
2007-09-29 17:43:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I think you should break your question into smaller pieces. I'm here to have some fun and learn a little bit. not to fricken type the whole nigfht through.
1. i never gave that any though.
2. i have no idea.
3. thats just the way it is.
4. matter is not perfectly organized.its alive
5. see #4
6. life is still matter life is a basic law
7. in the beginning, dosen't matter, i don't know
8. its offspring.
8.
2007-09-29 17:49:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
why ask here? and why ask "evolutionists" when most of your questions isnt really about evolution?
i hope you know now why you thought:
"1. I did not get any answer that even match what evolutionists believe, they contradicted themselves, and 2. I have not been able to keep up with the answers"
wait for the flu to clear up..
2007-09-29 17:47:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Pisces 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Apart from the last question, none of these are within the field of evolutionary biology.
You are best asking astrophysicists rather than biologists the first five questions. Try asking in "Science and Mathematics >Astronomy and Space" or ">Physics"
6 and 7 are in the field of abiogenesis. There are a number of hypotheses, but no one knows for sure. Try asking in ">Biology"
2007-09-29 17:43:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
What is it with you guys and ripping off Kent Hovind? If I see a Theist place "where did the space for the universe come from" AFTER "where did matter come from", I'll suck his dick.
2015-07-23 00:49:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋