This page will answer all your questions. Transitional fossils, micro and macroevolution, and everything else you've wondered is answered here.
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html
If you have any questions, ask them and I'll try to answer.
2007-09-29 14:41:49 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Unfortunately the following website is not well staffed (or funded) but it is a good counter to talkorigins and is very informative about talkorigins BS.
http://www.trueorigin.org/
2007-09-29 14:57:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Creationism is a at the same time true and a mistake because they realy think that it happens in 6x24 hours.
But Peter said "Dont forget beloved that for God, a day may be thousand years and thousand years are worth one day"
This means that 1E-43 seconds (0. 42 zeros1 sec.) which is the Big Band is The First Day and 9 Billion years from the appearance of the first unicellulars life to now is 1 day too...
and on this 6th day, the creation evoluted
The second mistake is that in Genesis, a translation error happend when they say that "the spirit of God was over the water" instead of the "waves" wich means the original radiation of the black matter composing 99.99% of the Universe.
The third mistake is that God created man before woman because the woman is XX and God took a rib af the woman to make of her a man wich is XY.
Crazy, isn'it
2007-09-29 21:46:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Question: Why do closely related organisms have similar DNA sequences and why is the amount of DNA difference between species consistent with the average mutation rate over the time two species shared a common ancestor.
2007-09-29 21:54:04 · answer #3 · answered by Herschel Krustofski 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No I am not skeptical about evolution. I am only disappointed that not many people are able to accept it as creditable prof of where we come from. But more concerned is that religious groups want to get rid of teaching evolution to the point of not ever being heard of.
2007-09-29 21:46:25 · answer #4 · answered by Imagine No Religion 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I am not skeptical about the fact that evolution occurs, I am however skeptical of those who pretend that we have all the answers...
2007-09-29 22:43:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Anybody who is not skeptical about any theory is not a scientist. That's what science is all about, a skeptical continuance to verify new and old theories, no matter how well founded, as evolution is.
2007-09-29 21:45:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
i'm skeptical in proportion to the lack of evidence for particular evolutionary scenarios. that evolution occurs though, is as sure as that gravitation occurs. common descent seems well supported for smaller groups such as vertebrates, and remains a reasonable hypothesis for all life on earth.
2007-09-29 21:49:35 · answer #7 · answered by vorenhutz 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
there is nothing wrongs in being skeptical , we should be skeptical about every knowledge there is , before , we wants it's as to be inserts into our mind for to be our principles emotion charges reaction.
2007-09-30 03:20:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
About as skeptical as I am about gravitation.
I am convinced that there are still gaps in our knowledge about both evolution and gravitation - but not completely understanding a phenomenon does not make it untrue.
2007-09-29 21:45:34 · answer #9 · answered by qxzqxzqxz 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Was lateral gene transfer of biomineralization gene families responsible in part for the so-called "Cambrian Explosion?"
2007-09-29 22:39:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋