Do Creationists have evidence?

Question

In the Creation Museum, they have dinosaurs with saddles.
http://www.acepilots.com/mt/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/tricera_saddle.jpg

Where was the first dinosaur saddle made? The first horse saddle dates to about 700BCE in Assyria.

Answer 1

Triceratops saddles were unknown until the opening of the creation "museum." They apparently don't have a relic Tricerstops saddle on exhibit, or a written eyewitness account of what one looked like. Evidence is something that other people want, not Fundies.

Answer 2

The Goat Herders' Guide to the Galaxy - there is NO other evidence
BUT
if you have that, you need nothing else because, you are enthralled by the power of Bronze Age myths and superstitions which explain everything you may ask … except how far is the distance to the sun, the moon, who first harnessed fire to cook meat, who invented the wheel and when, who domesticated the camel and dog and horse, and a few other things I can’t be bothered thinking of.

Christianity like Islam is a religion that thrives on the arrogant assumption that it is the most logical, the most scientific and the most perfect religion. While the fact is that it is the stupidest doctrine — the most backward and absurd belief.
.

Answer 3

Sorry, i honestly doubt that people subjugated dinosaurs and made them wear saddles, but there is evidence for creation, (though most research simply centers around disproving Neo-Darwinism)
Dr. Thomas Barnes, Emeritus Professor of Physics at the University of Texas at El Paso, has published the definitive work in this field. Scientific observations since 1829 have shown that the earth's magnetic field has been measurably decaying at an exponential rate, demonstrating its half-life to be approximately 1,400 years. In practical application its strength 20,000 years ago would approximate that of a magnetic star. Under those conditions many of the molecules necessary for life processes could not form. These data demonstrate that earth's entire history is young, within a few thousand of years.
Man-made artifacts - such as the hammer in Cretaceous rock, a human sandal print with trilobite in Cambrian rock, human footprints and a handprint in Cretaceous rock – point to the fact that all the supposed geologic periods actually occurred at the same time in the recent past.
A living cell is so awesomely complex that its interdependent components stagger the imagination and defy evolutionary explanations. A minimal cell contains over 60,000 proteins of 100 different configurations. The chance of this assemblage occurring by chance is 1 in 10 4,478,296 .
The human brain is the most complicated structure in the known universe. It contains over 100 billion cells, each with over 50,000 neuron connections to other brain cells. This structure receives over 100 million separate signals from the total human body every second. If we learned something new every second of our lives, it would take three million years to exhaust the capacity of the human brain. In addition to conscious thought, people can actually reason, anticipate consequences, and devise plans - all without knowing they are doing so.
The complexity of life itself points to a creator. Please research more, this is so very brief!!! No evidence either direction is perfectly conclusive, (hence the term theory) but there is a lot of info out there, (and a lot of trash to sift through from both sides)
ps. anyone who wants to know more send evolution evidence to [e-mail].

Answer 4

I don't know where this museum comes up with these concepts. I don't believe these animals were ever subdued for domestication.
Besides, the picture shows a saddle placed on the statue for entertainment purposes.

Don't turn this into something it's NOT!

GOD bless

Answer 5

Noah should've breeded the dinosarus! We would all be driving dinosaurs instead of cars!!!

Creationists make me laugh, I want to go that "museum" it would be the funniest trip I would ever make.
You would have to outright deny the hundreds of years of evidence given by the scientific fields of astronomy, archaeology, anthropology, evolutionary biology, genetics, palaeontology, biochemistry, astrophysics, geology, systematics, microbiology, bioinformatics, sedimentology, geophysics and most other earth science or biological scientific fields.

If you manage to do that you would be outright ******* insane.

Answer 6

Creationist have the same evidence as evolutionist. They just interpret the information differently. Everyone starts out with their preconceived ideas and then interprets the information they receive from that starting point.

We could both be looking at the same magazine but If you are looking at the front cover and I am looking at the back cover we are seeing two different things.

Answer 7

Dinosaurs: Those Terrible Lizards
48 min - Sep 15, 2007 - (5 ratings)
watch?v=typrxYyiEEI . Duane Gish Ph.D. Biochemistry, University of California, Berkley. Dr. Gish is the Vice President of the Institute
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVvGByvp13Q

Dr. Duane Gish, Vice-President of the Institute for Creation Research, challenge the fossil record against the arguments of Evolutionary teaching....creation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NkO6fQvydM

Answer 8

Creation museum denotes some sort of truth. Creation science is a misnomer, there is NO evidence at all that the creation happened as described in the bible.

Answer 9

there is tremendous evidence for creation and you gotta work pretty hard to ignore it

as far as the creation museum, there are many highly educated and bright scientists, historians, medical professors, chemists, biologists, astronomers, geologists and liguists to name a few who feel the case for creation is compelling

oftentimes however.. creationists and naturalists both have the same data but come to the evidence with vastly different assumptions which drive different conclusions... but that would not be a difference of evidense but of teh assumptions

Answer 10

Creationists have "evidence", but it has been "cherry-picked". They loudly showcase anything that seeming supports their claims and ignore any evidence (and there is a LOT) which discredits them. That's NOT science at all, but they'd have you believe it.