English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-09-29 11:50:17 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Videos by creationists aren't scientific or peer-reviewed.
Do you have a scientific peer-reviewed report or journal supporting creationism?

2007-09-29 11:57:14 · update #1

Just did a search of "evolution" on my online university library and got 16540 hits.

2007-09-29 12:02:44 · update #2

So much for no reports supporting evolution.

2007-09-29 12:04:49 · update #3

You have reports that show evolution can be difficult and you have the delusion of thinking that if evolution is hard to do then creationism is the only possible alternative.

2007-09-29 12:10:13 · update #4

18 answers

Yeah right. You'll be searching for LONG time for one of those.

2007-09-29 12:10:44 · answer #1 · answered by Two quarters & a heart down 5 · 0 0

If you know your scientific history, you'll know that science was created to study what God created. Not to prove there isn't a God. Many scientists in the past who have searched for proof there was no God in a serious manner have become Christians. Sites below with more information.

I know you have your own ideas, and that is fine. I just want to point out one flaw in the Big Bang theory. The things that became the earth and stars and other planets came from SOMEWHERE...so, whatever means of origin you believe, you are taking it on faith. Not faith in God, but faith in the theory. You cannot prove creationism or the other side. All you can do is look at today and extrapolate from there. No one knows the truth about creation until they die.

I usually agree to disagree. I know you have your own beliefs, and I don't expect you to accept what I believe just because I told you how I feel and linked you to a million sites. What I hope you can understand is: no matter whether you believe in God or the Big Bang, you have to take something on faith. Whether it is the existence of an intelligence like God or the ooze that became life, it had to come from somewhere. Creationists believe the ooze came from God. Where did the ooze come from if it isn't from God? Most people believe it has just always been in existence. That is fine with me. But they have to take that existence on faith, don't they..because they weren't in existence when it happened.

I don't want any angry emails. If anyone would like to also share their opinion and disagree with me, it will benefit the questioner a lot more than it will benefit me. This should be a healthy debate. Not a slam-fest between Creationists and Atheists/Agnostics. Just answer the question. That's why it was asked.

2007-09-29 19:12:21 · answer #2 · answered by Serena 7 · 0 1

ok the problem of creationism is NOT the religious beliefs within it; it is the agenda that science education should be replaced with religious education in the science classroom.

Intelligent Design proponents ARE trying to get their religious beliefs written into scientific journals, are enccouraging and offering rewards to those who manage this. They ARE trying to get scientific research which supports evolution to be perceived as opinion (which is not what theory is) or a belief system/religion.

Creationism is a religious belief. Evolution is a scientific theory. Those are different realms of human endeavor, and not the same, as creationists insist.

2007-09-29 19:02:36 · answer #3 · answered by SC 5 · 1 0

http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles_chron.htm

Creation Research Quaterly

Published continuously since 1964
Peer-reviewed by degreed scientists
World-wide circulation
Scholarly articles representing the major scientific disciplines
Fresh perspectives on science and society as impacted by origins
Emphasis on scientific evidence supporting: intelligent design, a recent creation, and a catastrophic worldwide flood

2007-09-29 19:04:11 · answer #4 · answered by Martin S 7 · 2 1

If by some miracle you do get an answer that gives such a report or journal, email me and tell me the name of it because I'd love to read it.

2007-09-29 18:56:25 · answer #5 · answered by Subconsciousless 7 · 1 0

Can anyone give me a scientific peer-reviewed report or journal supporting ether theory?

No
So what is the use of this endless debate.

When you got some proof either way, then come talk about!

2007-09-29 18:56:33 · answer #6 · answered by Willy 5 · 0 3

I'm guessing atheistic journals wouldn't include articles about creation, but there is one published by Answers in Genesis called TJ, which would go into some detail about various topics.

2007-09-29 18:54:01 · answer #7 · answered by STEPHEN J 4 · 1 2

I understand your exasperation with creation myths and the feeble attempts to turn them into historic truth, but why feed the misdirected conflation of the investigation of physical reality with spiritual reality? Wouldn't it be more productive to reiterate that physical reality has its own set of investigative models and spiritual reality has its? Knowledge is one, and folks must be allowed to investigate all that implies with the realization that there are limits to our investigative abilities. Those limits however should not impede investigation that serves a humane purpose.

2007-09-29 18:56:46 · answer #8 · answered by jaicee 6 · 0 1

They can't......but scientifically we have fossils......dinosaurs....the fact that no one alive here today or ever can prove God's existence in any way, it goes on and on. The earth evolved just as the entire solar system is constantly changing, so do we....wake up...I mean really "God created the earth in 7 days" is bible sputter people.....man wrote the bible...... Great question....

2007-09-29 19:07:33 · answer #9 · answered by Mysteri O 3 · 0 1

Yes,read Genesis.

2007-09-29 18:57:36 · answer #10 · answered by elaine 30705 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers