How can Miller make a Man Law against fruit in beer but then come out with Miller Chill??

Answer 1

Big companies do it all the time. "We will never EVER have a product like this. It just isn't done here." And the next thing you know, they've "invented" something that was suggested by a consumer... and it was exactly the product they said they would never EVER sell.

Buncha hypocrites! lol

Answer 2

That depends, who's the current CEO of the company? If it's a woman, then it would make sense if Man Law no longer applies to their products. But even if only the advertising executive is a woman, than any attempt to actually enforce "Man Law" in their policies could be deemed sexual harassment or discrimination and might get the company seriously sued.

Answer 3

I know, right?! How ironic can you get w/o puking?
I am a huge fan of MGD (in fact, it's the only domestic beer I'll drink)...but that Miller Chill just took it a bit too far.
What hypocrites!

Answer 4

I am not familiar with Miller Chill yet. But yes, if they came out with a fruity beer they need to be boycotted. I certainly will, man law is man law. if you're going to invoke man law, then you have to live up to it.

Answer 5

Miller chill is artificially flavored. Therefore there is no fruit in the beer. therefore they have not violated the man law.

Answer 6

Haha cause you don't actually put a lime wedge in it like some people do with Corona's. I tried that Miller Chill....don't know why, but someone bought em and I had one....won't do that again.

"I had scurvy once.....don't fruit the beer!"

Answer 7

Bahahahaha that was a great question. You should put it to Miller. Maybe they will do a commercial repealing the 'Man Law"

Answer 8

when one of the executives goes to a party and see's everyone drinking Corona with lime they get a stupid marketing idea that it would work with Miller beer.

Answer 9

if its artificial then why do they call it an authentic mexican recipe? that means they are liars and fakes

Answer 10

money making strategy.