English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

That's interesting ... but I think people on both sides of the pond have a tendency to get overly exercised about these slight differences. Neither is more "correct" than the other.

I am English, but as an Anglo-Italian, I prefer the American spelling of words like "color" and "flavor" (even though I don't use them myself), as they are closer to the original Latin roots of those words. I guess the -our endings in British English are indicative of a Norman French etymology. It is odd that we spell these words in different ways, as European migration to America did not begin until a good 400 years after the end of the Norman period.

But when all is said and done, I am very much in favour of individual choice and freedom in communication, both spoken and written. There is far too much pointless preciousness about spelling.

2007-09-29 04:50:02 · answer #1 · answered by Cosimo )O( 7 · 8 0

I wouldn't be suprised with the high levels of Europeans moving/traveling here to the states (most of them learn British English because of their proximity). I also think that globalization plays a huge role. With English becoming a dominant world language many people are learning it. Many of them however, choose to learn British English because this is considered the more formal dialect. I occasionally see British spelling while in different forums on the net.

2007-09-29 04:11:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

You see the occasional building labelled "Centre", but other than that, we use only American spellings. There's no point to using British spellings because we are Americans. Centralized makes more sense than centralised because the sound is a "z". Color makes more sense than colour because what's the point of the "u" there anyway? British spelling differences are archaisms and based on medieval French spellings originally. But, then again, the whole system is based on 900-year-old Norman French spelling rules anyway.

2007-09-29 04:43:49 · answer #3 · answered by Taivo 7 · 5 1

We in Australia use the British spellings, but actually I can't see the point of some of them. For instance, "color" is the original Latin spelling. Why do we include the "u"?

It can't be from French, as they spell it "couleur".

2007-09-29 04:27:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Sounds odd to me.

Which words ? Not colour or flavour surely ?

2007-09-29 03:49:14 · answer #5 · answered by Beardo 7 · 0 0

I haven't noticed this phemonena you speak of.

2007-09-29 03:47:50 · answer #6 · answered by Lydia H 5 · 2 0

Like what?

2007-09-29 18:28:28 · answer #7 · answered by loralaey 6 · 0 0

I hope they do. Its the proper way. This is because it was the first way. I think its silly to have differences... Like color and colour... Its just annoying...

2007-09-29 03:49:42 · answer #8 · answered by нαωαιιαи ιcє♥ 2 · 0 4

have they?

2007-09-29 03:43:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers