Compared to other versions of windows vista?
2007-09-29 03:16:27 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Computers & Internet ➔ Software
Of course it is but that's why you get a 64 bit duel core processor 2 gigs of on-board ram, but you can choose what is load up on start up you don't always need everything but the more bells and whistles the more it takes to operate it.
2007-09-29 03:22:37 · answer #1 · answered by Right 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you run all of the bells and whistles that Vista Ultimate is capable of, then yes, it's a resource hog for sure. It will need a commit ram charge of at least 1gig of memory. I would suggest a minumum of 2 gigs. I run Vista Home Pre. and have about 800 megs that are assigned to just run the system. But since I have 2 gigs installed everything runs just fine.
2007-09-29 03:24:58 · answer #2 · answered by Ron M 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
do now not permit the others scare you removed from Vista, it has superior lots because of the fact it first got here out. it is not buggy anymore and this is backwards-properly matched with ninety 9.9% of XP classes. Plus, XP will quickly be unsupported with the help of Microsoft so it particularly is terrific to flow to their new working gadget. the only issues are: -It makes use of a touch extra RAM than XP, yet with 2 GB that isn't a project in any respect. -The aero interface does drain your video card a touch. yet you may particularly disable residing house windows Aero with the help of replacing the subject to classic Mode and it will not often use your pictures card's materials in any respect. So on your computing device, i could actually propose Vista maximum suitable over XP, this is going to hold out lots extra efficient
2017-01-02 19:43:32 · answer #3 · answered by barlag 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋