English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1. Since wholes include you, you would be thought as part.
2. Since parts compose you, you would be thought as whole.
3. Since differences distinguish you, you would be thought as equivalence.
4. Since equivalences equate you, you would be thought as uniqueness.
5. Since limits limit you, you would be thought as link.
6. Since links link you, you would be thought as limit.
7. Since influences influence you, you would be thought as sensation.
8. Since sensations sense you, you would be thought as influence.
9. Since derivatives inherit you, you would be thought as origin.
10. Since origins originate you, you would be thought as derivative.
11. Since conditions condition you, you would be thought as rule.
12. Since rules rule you, you would be thought as condition.
13. Since fulfillments fulfill you, you would be thought as intent.
14. Since intents intend you, you would be thought as fulfillment.

What else would be thought about you?

2007-09-28 19:01:33 · 2 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

2 answers

This sort of dualistic thought is irrelevant. It is concocted by the desire for simplicity and pointless discussions that avoid responsibility for actual dialog that might result in change.

2007-09-28 19:26:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Since dreams dream you, you would be thought of as dream.
Get real.


The Will is positive, the Judgment is negative.

2007-09-29 14:37:44 · answer #2 · answered by Psyengine 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers