Sensative New Age Guys. The kind of Guy who blindly supports anything women say in an effort to make him self more like a woman
Do women really like snags?
2007-09-28 17:21:04 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Gender Studies
I think that most women still prefer the bad boys, because they seem more masculine than the sensitive types. Unless she is Bi or a lesbian; but then a lesbian would not want you.
Women seem to prefer a guy who is assertive, doesn't mind taking the lead, and doesn't care what other people think of him -- he does his own thing even if others might disapprove.
SNAGs, as you call them, are often too nice for most women; they never make a plan without asking the girl first, never stand up to her or anyone else, never voice an opinion, and never take a risk.
Women seem genetically predispositioned to want a guy to act like a MAN.
Not a jerk, just a man with a backbone.
2007-10-01 09:20:59 · answer #1 · answered by Grandpa S 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm pretty sure that "sensitive" and "New Age" do not somehow automatically equal "blindly supporting anything women say." In fact, I don't know any reasonable human being on earth who would "blindly support anything a woman says." I unfortunately do not consider men saying and doing anything to get laid "reasonable."
2007-09-29 12:33:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Cool term. I consider myself one, but not the definition you described. Some women like SNAGS, others can't date any other type of man, because they associate too much negative things with non-SNAG men.
2007-09-29 09:25:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I know a sensitive New Age guy. He supports the power of women, but also recognizes their follies and is unafraid to bring them up. He likes being a man, and I like him.
2007-09-29 09:06:09 · answer #4 · answered by Rio Madeira 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
More like a woman?
I think guys really do not have to do a lot of talking announcing that they are women's supporters/ advocates. They should walk the talk.
Help in advancing women's rights by being fair partner and by treating women as their equals.
2007-09-29 01:07:33 · answer #5 · answered by myles 2 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Sometimes the fact that I support Your 'right' to freedom of speech, freedom of thought and freedom of self expression causes Me some self doubt.
In a world where being numerate, literate, articulate, cogent and sentient are considered to be commensurate with homogeneous and systematic reasoning why would You endeavor to create an atmosphere of animosity between the genders and to cast aspersions as to the intellectual competency of your fellow contributors?
The very idea that You should choose to use this forum to pontificate Your palaeosexist (gender non-specific) propaganda would appear to be moderately askew of rational human interaction, and intercourse.
"G&WS" was set up so as to ameliorate rather than obfuscate the commonality of the Genders. If this confounds You, perhaps the prospect of making enquiries in the appropriate section of "Answers", namely, "Psychology" would be more to You liking?
ThereYou have it. We have now both exercised Our inalienable and absolute right to express an opinion.
2007-09-29 01:38:27 · answer #6 · answered by Ashleigh 7 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Good question... But its a good thing to have more snags... Since they never get any, there'll be more for us left!
2007-09-29 13:56:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
No. We prefer intelligent and witty, well mannered and compassionate people... We enjoy exchanging ideas with you. Spineless whiners are for little girls, women need men.
2007-09-29 00:36:17 · answer #8 · answered by ms.sophisticate 7 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Yes.
2007-09-29 02:43:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
That's unnatural IMO.
2007-09-29 09:21:10 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋