English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

FACT: http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.html

As most Merry-neocons (Americans) constantly rant on how the Iranian President is akin to Hitler!? - I would like to pose the question to those same scumbags (select few scumbags who are arrogant and set in their evil ways and mentality) if the iranian president is related to Bush?

2007-09-28 15:38:38 · 12 answers · asked by Harribo 1 in Politics & Government Politics

12 answers

Prescott Bush did have his assets frozen under the Trading with the Enemy act during WW2. But I think helped Hitler's rise to power may be a stretch.

2007-09-28 15:42:34 · answer #1 · answered by Sageandscholar 7 · 2 2

Most of the people who equate the Iranian president with Hitler don't know how the Iranian government is set up. Hitler, as chancellor of Germany, controlled that countries military. A president of Iran doesn't have that power. That power rests with the clerics.

As for Bush's grandfather, it's old, irrelevant news.

2007-09-28 22:53:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Many US conservtives and industrialists admired and supported the Nazis during their rise to power and early years in power.

What sets Prescott Bush apart in a class of traitors by himself is that he continued doing business with the nazis through 1942, which was some months AFTER Germany declared war on us. If he hadn't been a Senator, he likely would have been tried and convicted of treason.

2007-09-28 22:43:38 · answer #3 · answered by obl_alive_and_well 4 · 1 2

Not related to Bush at all. Whatever his grandfather did has no impact on him. He had no power over the man and could not control him.

2007-09-28 22:41:51 · answer #4 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 3 2

yes and so did others like Prescott Bush that believed in eugenics. as far as Irans prez,i don't think he is related to Bush

2007-09-28 22:43:56 · answer #5 · answered by here to help 7 · 0 2

Guardian Unlimited is not a neutral source.

2007-09-28 22:41:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

and FACT..by being a liberal extremist you have helped get a clinton back into power

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
my point is both of us can draw our own conclusion from conincendental facts..whats your point here?

2007-09-28 22:44:24 · answer #7 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1 3

Shoo perro!

2007-09-28 22:47:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Kennedy's dad did too, what's you point.
I guess you're skeletal closet is squeaky clean?

2007-09-28 22:48:45 · answer #9 · answered by time_wounds_all_heelz 5 · 1 2

Then why is he doing what he is doing now?

2007-09-29 00:06:50 · answer #10 · answered by bobanalyst 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers