English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

ijust dont understand why?indians were on there own land and the white man took it but they dont own it mother earth has no owners except god

2007-09-28 14:55:27 · 5 answers · asked by ed t 1 in Arts & Humanities History

5 answers

You need to read a little more on the subject. And, look at it in the time frame it happened, when religion ruled, not science. The colonists thought they were doing the right thing by trying to "civilize" them. Also, you need to understand that the different tribes of Native Americans were constantly warring with each other. They often freely gave up land (or sold it), in exchange for guns. Guns were new to them, and a new source of power that they desperately wanted in order to both defend themselves, and conquer other tribes. The colonists and the Native Americans actually became very co-dependent. The colonists had modern weapons, the Native Americans had land and knowledge of indigenous plants and animals, as well as geography. And, although Europeans did break some of the treaties, so did the Native Americans. You need to see them as a bunch of separate tribes, not as one unified nation that was eradicated. I am not justifying some of the things the Europeans did, just pointing out that it was a two-way street.

2007-09-28 15:49:18 · answer #1 · answered by steddy voter 6 · 1 0

Because the american indians had the land the white man wanted

2007-09-28 18:19:29 · answer #2 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 0 0

The white man freed the slaves? What history book have you been reading?
As for the respondent that said the 'Europeans'...I think they were Americans...yep at this point they were Americans.

Would love to help you understand but I think you'd get lost in translation.

2007-09-28 17:42:33 · answer #3 · answered by PeachJello 6 · 1 1

Hi

Friend refer to this website:http://www.discovergoldenindia.com/index.asp


A great general has said that the only good Indian is a dead one, and that high sanction of his destruction has been an enormous factor in promoting Indian massacres. In a sense, I agree with the sentiment, but only in this: that all the Indian there is in the race should be dead. Kill the Indian in him, and save the man.

We are just now making a great pretence of anxiety to civilize the Indians. I use the word “pretence” purposely, and mean it to have all the significance it can possibly carry. Washington believed that commerce freely entered into between us and the Indians would bring about their civilization, and Washington was right. He was followed by Jefferson, who inaugurated the reservation plan. Jefferson’s reservation was to be the country west of the Mississippi; and he issued instructions to those controlling Indian matters to get the Indians there, and let the Great River be the line between them and the whites. Any method of securing removal - persuasion, purchase, or force - was authorized.

Jefferson’s plan became the permanent policy. The removals have generally been accomplished by purchase, and the evils of this are greater than those of all the others combined. . . .

It is a sad day for the Indians when they fall under the assaults of our troops, as in the Piegan massacre, the massacre of Old Black Kettle and his Cheyennes at what is termed “the battle of the Washita,” and hundreds of other like places in the history of our dealings with them; but a far sadder day is it for them when they fall under the baneful influences of a treaty agreement with the United States whereby they are to receive large annuities, and to be protected on reservations, and held apart from all association with the best of our civilization. The destruction is not so speedy, but it is far more general. The history of the Miamis and Osages is only the true picture of all other tribes.

“Put yourself in his place” is as good a guide to a proper conception of the Indian and his cause as it is to help us to right conclusions in our relations with other men. For many years we greatly oppressed the black man, but the germ of human liberty remained among us and grew, until, in spite of our irregularities, there came from the lowest savagery into intelligent manhood and freedom among us more than seven millions of our population, who are to-day an element of industrial value with which we could not well dispense. However great this victory has been for us, we have not yet fully learned our lesson nor completed our work; nor will we have done so until there is throughout all of our communities the most unequivocal and complete acceptance of our own doctrines, both national and religious. Not until there shall be in every locality throughout the nation a supremacy of the Bible principle of the brotherhood of man and the fatherhood of God, and full obedience to the doctrine of our Declaration that “we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created free and equal, with certain inalienable rights,” and of the clause in our Constitution which forbids that there shall be “any abridgment of the rights of citizens on account of race, color, or previous condition.” I leave off the last two words “of servitude,” because I want to be entirely and consistently American.

Inscrutable are the ways of Providence. Horrible as were the experiences of its introduction, and of slavery itself, there was concealed in them the greatest blessing that ever came to the ***** race—seven millions of blacks from cannibalism in darkest Africa to citizenship in free and enlightened America; not full, not complete citizenship, but possible—probable—citizenship, and on the highway and near to it.

There is a great lesson in this. The schools did not make them citizens, the schools did not teach them the language, nor make them industrious and self-supporting. Denied the right of schools, they became English-speaking and industrious through the influences of association. Scattered here and there, under the care and authority of individuals of the higher race, they learned self-support and something of citizenship, and so reached their present place. No other influence or force would have so speedily accomplished such a result. Left in Africa, surrounded by their fellow-savages, our seven millions of industrious black fellow-citizens would still be savages. Transferred into these new surroundings and experiences, behold the result. They became English-speaking and civilized, because forced into association with English-speaking and civilized people; became healthy and multiplied, because they were property; and industrious, because industry, which brings contentment and health, was a necessary quality to increase their value.

2007-09-28 18:39:45 · answer #4 · answered by praveeng 2 · 0 1

actually the indians had no concept of private property

2007-09-28 16:58:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers