In 1999, George Herbert Walker Bush officially adopted Bill Clinton as his son.
This is why they are always hanging around together, laughing and having a grand old time. GW Bush even complained that dad spends more time with his "new" son that with GW or Jeb or the rest of the Bush-bloods.
So, since Hillary won't divorce Bill and stand on her own as Hillary Rodham, electing her will effectively continue the Bush family dynasty.
OH NO, you say?
Interesting that Hillary admits she will follow the exact same course of action that GW had planned for Iraq. (She'll say something else, just to get elected. It's cool. The rich elite families know how the game works, gotta please the plebes.) But really, Hillary knows that nothing will change.
And there are even plans for GWH Bush will continue to join Bill on his world ambassador tour. Heck, even Bill's half brother GW can come along. Sure, why not.
It's going to be funny when people realize this is true.
2007-09-28 12:49:24 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Too many people don't pay attention and don't realize that the Clintons' and Bushs' are totally chummy behind the scenes and they are one and the same.
2007-09-28 17:05:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. You're right. It's funny that she still has support since she will keep the Iraq war going a long time, but she does. Doesn't this prove that her supporters don't really care? She could say she thinks our health care system is just fine, and they'd go for that too. I can't figure out what these people really stand for.
2007-09-28 13:04:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Blasphemy! How dare you sully the good name of Billiam H Clinton you insolent little shrew! Though BC may be on close terms with GHWB, that's hardly being close to Dubya. He's the one I care about. GHWB was just another caretaker prez. Dubya has the kind of stubborn morality and feeble mind that can bring down nations.
2007-09-28 12:58:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well. What can I say even since Bush father and son became presidents they brought war to America. And when Clinton reigned we never had a war. But some say that Hilary is also gonna bring war who knows? the 2008 elections aren't far you know.
2007-09-28 12:53:59 · answer #4 · answered by dorothy00505 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I hope you have joined the millions trying to impeach Bill adopted dad. It is always sad when dad becomes a murderous criminal.
I will vote for Hillary because she stood up to the insurance company and exposed them.
She also backed down on bring the troops out of the idiotic occupation of Iraq.
I will vote for her now that she has exposed the insurance industry giving credibility to my stituation.
2007-09-28 12:56:01 · answer #5 · answered by granny_sp 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I will vote for anyone but a postmodernist pseudo-theocratic extremist republican statist and would-be tsar.
That includes Hilary, who by my judgment, is the fourth or
fifth best candidate Democrats have, behind John Edwards, Bill Richardson, Joe Biden and Mike Gravel, at least.
2007-09-28 12:57:30 · answer #6 · answered by Robert David M 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Are u the next to go
its Halloween night and editors are a fright!
2007-09-28 13:06:19 · answer #7 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh Dorothy........u say Clinton never brought war? Tell that to all the servicemens families who got butchered in the Somalia debacle! Shame on you!
2007-09-28 12:56:52 · answer #8 · answered by Joe S 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You really need to get back on your meds or get to the "hospital" real soon. Your sweater with the nice, long sleeves that tie in the back, is missing you!
2007-09-28 12:55:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You closet republicans will say anything to get a little attention. What an imagination!
2007-09-28 13:01:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋