Countries of Indian Sub-Continent?

Question

What do you think of Dravidistan, Hindustan, and Khalistan, while ther are also Pakistan and Bangladesh? Do you think the first three would be better off as seperate countries? Do you think Pakistan and Bangladesh were nessecary? Explain please because this issue is bothering me.

Answer 1

Above two answers (Ravan2nd and viswamvishnu) were to the point except someone mentioned “Pakistan and Bangladesh are necessary for US and Co to create instability” oblique reference about creation of my country as the work of USA to destabilize this region, which is furthest from the truth.

In fact, it is India who helped create both Pakistan and then Bangladesh. Recent history has ample proof as to how the oppressed Bengalis were helped to get free from the Pakistani rulers by the Indian politicians and military. If there were justice in Pakistani ruling class then the creation of Bangladesh could have been avoided and Sheikh Mujibur Rahman would have been the Prime Minister of the whole of Pakistan (East and West wings) back in 1971 and he would probably been alive today.

Btw, about Dravidistan – I thought we the Bengali people belong to the Dravidian race rather than Aryans who are descendants from Germans and Persians, as claimed by their rulers.

Answer 2

The United States, especially were I live there is a huge Indian and Persian community in the northern sides of town. They have growing communities everywhere in the United States, you would be able to find plenty of Indians going through the same experience as you while coming to America. In school, in businesses, everywhere. Many people here respect Indians, not sure about Pakistanis though. But I haven't seen any problems.

Answer 3

like or unlike EU, it is so from inception;
but Dravidistan will include Tamilnadu,Andra Pradesh,Kerala, Karnataka,Konkan and Goa;
Hindustan will not have north-eastern states because people have been convereted to christianity and islam, by pelf and hatred by aliens; it will not also have Uttar Pradesh because the spirit of one Nehru haunts; it will not have Maharashtra because it is under the control of underworld and mafia through film industry; west bengal will not be there because it is mortgaged to china; the rest will reel under threat.
pakistan and bangladesh are necessary for US and Co to create instability.
No mention about Nepal and Tibet as India with the help of US and co and China already destroyed them;
no need to bother, as things have been completed by faithfuls and fidels.

Answer 4

The divisions are not necessary if you have an able and neutral ruler like the ones in the past. When the rulers shift preferences every region will try to be separate and behave their own way. That is what happening now.

Answer 5

u dont have to bother about any thing now that the partition of states can be done for the benefit of the ministers to manage it but not the partion of the country any more becasue of some selfish community or netas.If they r real hindus they will not even think off that and if they r not then u can call them traitors.

Answer 6

I think seven countries is responsible to make up India sub continent
INDIA
BANGLADESH
SRI LANKA
NEPAL
MALDIVES
BHUTAN
PAKISTAN