Why can't they see that Bush is every bit the Dictator that Hillary is the socialist?
Communism is a method of government control and is not synonymous with socialism which is an economic structure that can exist within a democracy...
GOSH - propaganda really does work on ignorant people, doesn't it?
2007-09-28 10:29:11 · 16 answers · asked by rabble rouser 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I wish they would open a few more books.
While I am an Independent, admittedly the democrats here are by far, a hell of a lot more informed.
I disagree, respectfully with your assertion that Hillary is a socialist,one simply has to look at who is funding her, to see that this is not the case.
Hillary's voting record closely resembles that of a neo-con than a true socialist.
2007-09-28 10:32:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 4⤋
Bush isn't a dictator. This is still the stupidest claim of the leftists on this site.
Here's a relationship equation:
Socialism:dictatorship = falling from building:impact with sidewalk
In every socialist country we are witnessing the slow slide into serfdom to the state. In not a single socialist country is anybody either gaining or not losing freedoms and rights, it is a constant erosion of rights.
And that is happening here as well. That's what happens when you give the state power and control over your life.
2007-09-28 10:35:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
You couldnt have a dictator here, with the 3 branches of government. So your premise on Bush is worng. However, Hillary does push a socialist agenda and has for years...
2007-09-28 11:30:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
"There must be some redistribution of wealth for a civilized society to stay a civilized society and not a third worldwide u . s ." merely frightening. What surprising do you may the wealth of yet somebody else in society? answer: none. no person owes you a residing, a house, healthcare, a motor vehicle, etc. "There must be some degree of socialism" There already is, and has been through fact the recent Deal. i think of we've sufficient.
2016-10-09 23:53:52 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hugo Chavez is an example. With his socialism all things private are coming under government ownership. Meaning all things in that country will be controlled by the government, little no private sector. Chavez utterly controls the government (he has much more power in his country than bush has in his)and may well do so for the rest of his life. Right now instead of recruiting more police he's arming his supporters with military style weapons(his supporters only) to "fight the drug cartels". Right....
2007-09-28 10:42:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Get rich quick schemes in the capitalist business world, (buyouts, IPOs, conglomerates, acquisitions, mergers, and the stock market), do not actually work. Remaining solvent does not actually exist within false economics capitalism.
Profit existing in the capitalist business world, or millionaires existing within capitalism, is pathological deception committed by the 21 organizations spying on the population with plain clothes agents, (with covert fake names and fake backgrounds).
Actual economics is the persons paying the monthly business loan payments of companies voting at work in order to control the property they are paying for.
Capitalism is the psychology of imaginary parents, false economics, and the criminal deception of employees that are paying the bills (including the stocks and bonds, or shares) of companies.
Anti-democracy republicanism is the psychology of imaginary parents and false government.
2007-09-29 09:41:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
If Bush was a dictator there would be no House of Rep, Senate, or court system.
There would be nothing outside of the Executive Branch.
And you pretend to be so smart.
2007-09-28 10:38:18 · answer #7 · answered by Dina W 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Well, you are right on one point. Mrs. Clinton is a socialist. To say the President Bush is a dictator is just ludicrous.
Liberalism in the US = socialism = communism. Contemplate this equation for awhile.
2007-09-28 10:36:09 · answer #8 · answered by regerugged 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
President Bush is not a dictator with sole authority.
We have a balance of powers in the US.
2007-09-28 10:33:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
yes it does. anything but capitalism is a bad word in this country. the truth is that bush is one disaster away from being our dictator. look at nspd51 and hspd20.
he has the directives in place to assume continuity of government in the event of a natural disaster or emergency that takes place either here in the u.s. or anywhere in the world. in this event FEMA assumes control of all private and public domains. parks, farms, food, schools, transportation...everything. there are currently over 100 (conservative estimate) prisons or work camps being built by kbr (halliburton) to house immigrants, political dissenters, tax protesters and people with contageous disease. see rex 84, operation cable splicer, garden plot, fema red & blue lines, kansan city southern, gunderson rail car....
so we are pretty close to being under a dictator now. he doen not cooperate with congress he flat out tells them that he will not testify and he will veto....what is the difference?
2007-09-28 10:39:13 · answer #10 · answered by jenniferstruth 1 · 2⤊ 3⤋