English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I was just at a trolley stop that's also an Amtrak train station. I noticed a medium sized container that had two water spigots. one was marked "Potable" and the other marked "Non-Potable."

Really now, why not just use "Drinkable" and "Non-Drinkable"? What if someone without a strong grasp of English was having some sort of emergency and needed to drink some water?

2007-09-28 10:01:20 · 3 answers · asked by The Snappy Miss Pippi Von Trapp 7 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

3 answers

Yes...I agree...that's a little to "high brow" for a pubic sign...(oops...I mean "public" sign...a little Freudian slip, there...care for a cigar? oops...did it again...)

Now days...

There's no difference between the two unless it's bottled...and even then they discovered high levels of arsenic and old lace in certain brands of bottled water...

Al Gore hasn't even touched the tip of the brown iceberg, yet...

2007-09-29 10:55:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

.... well if there was another dispenser nearby that contained strong antibiotics then this question would be rendered moot.

2007-09-28 17:05:03 · answer #2 · answered by Ronatnyu 7 · 0 0

they want to be fancy

2007-09-29 02:29:11 · answer #3 · answered by Felix 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers