http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070928/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_nkorea
Didn't they villify Clinton for doing the exact same thing ?
Which might I add...was a bad idea then, and still is.
2007-09-28 09:49:49 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Clinton gave them technology, we're giving them money. I agree, it's a slippery slope, I was mad at Clinton for that, I'm not too pleased with Bush either. Still, I consider technology more severe, especially considering what he gave them (it was useful for making ICBMs... scary considering we now know NK has nukes).
2007-09-28 09:53:46 · answer #1 · answered by Pfo 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The United States on Friday announced it would spend up to $25 million to pay for 50,000 tons of heavy fuel oil for North Korea
They won't give Saddam 1 billion under the table to make him go away and avoid this never ending war
But they will give fuel oil to a country on the axis of evil just to get them to calm down and stop building nukes!
Hypocrisy at its finest!
Still think this President knows what he is doing!
I also heard Cons bitching for months because Clinton did this same thing!
2007-09-28 10:00:53 · answer #2 · answered by scottanthonydavis 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm with Pfo on this, and yes I agree that it's just as bad.
2007-09-28 10:10:10 · answer #3 · answered by ddey65 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Devil's in the details.
2007-09-28 09:57:53 · answer #4 · answered by Stereotypemebecauseyouknow 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you bet ye.
2007-09-28 09:56:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋