Who protests more loudly, and innocent person defending their innocence or a guilty person trying to avoid consequences?
2007-09-28 09:32:41 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
That is not true, if you have ever been conspired against you would know it! An innocent person will protest their innocence with anger in order to uphold their good name. A guilty person deserves what they get and knows it, they will eventually lay down because you can't fight a fight based upon lies.
2007-09-28 09:56:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
it is not true, while the guilty or a liar can certainly protest loudly to emphasis their shock at being accused and their innocence, so can the innocent protest loudly
and, since this is a common misconception passed around and believed, the smart guilty person or liar would make sure and not protest loudly
it is a myth, just like the one that if a person doesnt look you in the eye they are lying, that simply isnt true,
2007-09-28 17:09:46 · answer #2 · answered by dlin333 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
And some people just like to hear the sound of their own voices. Naturally, they will protest so loudly. It doesn't make them guilty or innocent, just attention seeking
2007-09-28 19:30:53 · answer #3 · answered by bluebell 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Those who are guilty tend to settle down easier and eventually accept their consequences... Those who are innocent tend to be extremely upset over their injustices. Some innocent eventually stop struggling but they never accept it...! As seen in many cases of jailing of the innocent... they twist and twist and twist and eventually they are found innocent before or after death!
Once again... notice the main word being "tend" and "some"...!!!
In contrast some innocent coil in and paralyze. Others rage like maniacs and are branded as guilty for their over-reaction!!!
No one can truly tell unless evidence is beyond reasonable doubt! (A concept that is very lightly taken in justice system all over the world...!)
2007-09-28 17:55:27 · answer #4 · answered by ikiraf 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Absolutes are problematic. I've witnessed bothed. A person who is consistently disbelieved may end up "fed up" with the issue and then adamantly refuse to accept any more accusations. many people have a breaking point.
So the way to have you believe me is to not kick up a fuss at false accusations. So even if I were guilty, I could just dismiss it and then you would believe it.
2007-09-28 18:20:59 · answer #5 · answered by guru 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Whatever value one wishes to assign to the statement is totally irrelevant, the quote is a giant logic fallacy.
2007-09-28 16:49:29 · answer #6 · answered by ycats 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I protest quite loudly when I'm innocent... and no one believes me... it makes me UBER-mad...
2007-09-29 00:15:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
False. Protest could come from someone who thinks that he was unjustly treated.
2007-09-28 16:59:32 · answer #8 · answered by IggySpirit 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it's true ... but someone who works in insurance told me that if someone makes a big fuss, to really investigate their claim.
So people often act as if it is true ...
2007-09-28 20:37:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋