I'm sorry but fair is fair . If he wants to hold liberal teachers responsible for properly teaching our students , then clearly he must hold himself responsible for delaying the signing of the 'NoLiberal Left-Behind Act' .
The Act could punish liberals for not being rational on the issues and double-talking , no , triple-talking their Iraq War views .
Punishment would be very light . We could give them what they want. . . . a tax hike , but ONLY for liberals .
NOTE -- The most insolent of the bunch could be made to salute the flag while reciting the Pledge of Allegiance .
But I agree with you libs . This president must take some action now .
What Do You Think ?
2007-09-28 08:30:16 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Holy crap, Batman!!!!! This is stinking hysterical!!!!! You are going to get me in trouble with my boss! I totally just busted out in hysterics. I love ya, Man!!!
2007-09-28 08:49:57 · answer #1 · answered by Tink 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Great!!!
The no Lib left behind as three main point to it.
1. No lib left behind in the USA for treason.
2. No lib left behind with a vote.
This applies because they can not pouch a hole in a paper to vote. ( Falling Chads)
3. No lib left behind for being stupid and it is costing to much money to try and educate a rock so we should cut and run and send them packing.
2007-09-28 16:19:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
It's a liberal fish fry hosted by Earnest!
2007-09-28 16:06:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Oh my, you're going to get some hostility on this one.
I guess if they can't take the heat, they should probably try taking a stand, huh?
flip
flop
flip
flop
flip
flop
2007-09-28 16:01:42 · answer #4 · answered by Roland'sMommy 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
You are in agreement with the President of Iran, then, who criticized the tradition of liberalism in the west as a failed methodology of government in a letter to Bush a year or two ago.
By the way, traditionally, liberalism was the march of individual freedoms awarded to people in the west, not the Republican mud slinging it represents today in America. Reagan started all the revisionist history trash talk in his run for the white house in '79.
2007-09-28 15:36:19 · answer #5 · answered by alphabetsoup2 5 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Well it fits their views but would not be fair, but again they are never fair when it comes to me.
I am torn on this piece of legislation.
2007-09-28 16:10:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Bush won't sign it because he is really a Liberal hiding in a Conservative suit. He fooled everyone that voted for him.
2007-09-28 15:48:17 · answer #7 · answered by Robert J 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
No one on here says it better than you!
2007-09-29 18:46:26 · answer #8 · answered by Brianne 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
why would he want to punish himself (being a liberal)? That makes no sense.
2007-09-28 15:48:36 · answer #9 · answered by Lily Iris 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Got a flash for you, Sparky: Our "president" IS a liberal. Check that budget deficit lately?
http://www.uuforum.org/deficit.htm
2007-09-28 15:35:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋