English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Please answer without jumping on the bandwagon. Please provide VALID reasons for disliking her. Do you think the "Hillary-haters" are informed about her policies, goals, and plans for America or do you think people dislike her because everyone else does?
I am just curious.

2007-09-28 08:29:49 · 27 answers · asked by Liberal City 6 in Politics & Government Politics

27 answers

She is a communist as the whole Democrat party. read this and learn.
She also sells poverty to keep poor people down and yes blacks.

1963 Communist Goals
The following was entered into the Congressional record by Albert Herlong, Jr. (a Floridian who served in Congress from 1949-69) in 1963.

1) US acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war
2) US willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war
3) Develop the illusion that total disarmament by the US would be a demonstration of "moral strength"
4) Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
5) Extension of long term loans to Russia and Soviet Satellites
6) Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination
7) Grant recognition of Red China, and admission of Red China to the UN.
8) Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the Germany question by free elections under supervision of the UN
9) Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the US has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress
10) Allow all Soviet Satellites individual representation in the UN
11) Promote the UN as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the UN as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo)
12) Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party
13) Do away with loyalty oaths
14) Continue giving Russia access to the US Patent Office
15) Capture one or both of the political parties in the US
16) Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions, by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
17) Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for Socialism, and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers associations. Put the party line in text books.
18) Gain control of all student newspapers
19) Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.
20) Infiltrate the press. Get control of book review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.
21) Gain control of key positions in radio, TV & motion pictures.
22) Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all form of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings", substitute shapeless, awkward, and meaningless forms.
23) Control art critics and directors of art museums. " Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art".
24) Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.
25) Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography, and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio and TV.
26) Present Homosexuality, degeneracy, and promiscuity as "normal, natural, and healthy".
27) Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch"
28) Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the grounds that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state"
29) Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.
30) Discredit the American founding fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man".
31) Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of "the big picture:" Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.
32) Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture - - education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.
33) Eliminate all laws or procedures, which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.
34) Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.
35) Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI
36) Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.
37) Infiltrate and gain control of big business
38) Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand or treat.
39) Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.
40) Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
41) Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.
42) Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special interest groups should rise up and make a "united force" to solve economic, political, or social problems.
43) Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.
44) Internationalize the Panama Canal.
45) Repeal the Connally Reservation so the US can not prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction over nations and individuals alike.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Check http://www.glennbeck.com for more

2007-09-28 10:16:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Anyone who dislikes, mistrusts and fears a Hillary presidency indeed IS informed!
Hillary Clinton is a longtime socialist. She has little more than contempt for the United States and the American people--at least those who live between New York and Los Angeles. If a national disaster were to put her in the White House, we would lose more of our rights and liberties to the omnipotent central federal power structure which she would want peering and creeping into every portion of our lives. The left was worried about those supposedly listening in to phone conversations? How about a socialized healthcare system which tells the American people what they can eat, how much exercise is required each day, how much alcohol they are allowed--marijuana would, of course, be perfectly acceptable--while cigarette smoking would serve to throw the smoker out of the system. He would be permitted to find his own coverage, being labeled a member of the "bad group of people who will not conform". Naturally the price would be in the area of 2-3 thousand dollars each month. And while he was no longer insured by Big Brother, payment for the system would still be removed by his employer according to federal law.
This is just a brief bit on Hillary-care. There aren't enough days remaining in this post to expose the frightening agenda of a Hillary term in office.

2007-09-28 08:59:23 · answer #2 · answered by bucksbowlbound 3 · 3 0

I don't consider myself a "Hillary-hater." However, I am not about to jump on the Hillary bandwagon solely out of some nostalgia for the Bill Clinton era. Those days are long gone and the nation needs to move on. I'm not too fond of political dynasties.

Also, it's still early in the campaign season. Front-runner status this soon does not guarantee a surefire nomination at the party convention. Fortunes can easily change in the near future. Just remember Howard Dean in '04.

2007-09-28 08:47:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

What true, patriotic American wouldn't dislike a lying hard-core Socialist like Mrs. Clinton, who hates the United States of America with such a venomous passion that she wants to drag us all down below the status of a Third World nation? She wants to impose socialized medicine on us all, and obviously wants to become the first female iron-fisted dictator in the world, with absolute power! Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely! I'm firmly convinced that the only reason she has stuck with that sleaze-bag, Bill Clinton, so long, is because she wanted all the power she could achieve riding on his coattails!

If she's such a great woman, why didn't she run for the U. S. Senate from Arkansas, or from her home State of Illinois? Because the people from Arkansas knew what a "itchbay" and "itchway" she was and the political machine in Illinois wouldn't have let this former Goldwater Republican represent *them* in the U. S. Senate! No, she had to become a "Carpetbagger" and run in the State of New York!

Have you never read the book, "Unlimited Access" by Gary Aldrich, former FBI Agent? The Clintons tried to suppress his book and took him to court over it; but he was *completely* exonerated, because there was enough corroboration from others to substantiate the truth therein! If anyone would read this book and still want a female like that to be the next President of the United States of America, I would have to question his or her sanity!

2007-09-28 12:12:33 · answer #4 · answered by trebor namyl hcaeb 6 · 0 0

it is astounding that, with each and every of the capacity of the federal government in the back of them, the Hillary Clinton haters ought to not get adequate genuine evidence for a single indictment, not to point a conviction. I recommend, a majority in the two homes of Congress, the White living house and a thoroughly politicized judiciary did not carry mutually adequate evidence to justify a single accusation! the two they're incompetent previous theory, or maybe she basically did not do diverse those issues. You Hillary haters are somewhat exciting at this factor. final 12 months she sang the national Anthem and you complained that her voice grow to be undesirable. If she had not sung you may have claimed she hated united states of america. there is not something she would be in a position to do this the instantaneous vilification squad can not twist or misconstrue. Has it not exceeded off to you which you have been her maximum excellent boosters? If all you Bush League liars had not been screaming approximately her apostate liberal plots we'd have forgotten her years in the past, yet you have given her sixteen years of loose exposure. added, when you consider that we now be attentive to the wonderful wing screamers lied approximately each and every thing else, we tend to think of which you lied approximately her besides. If she receives previous Obama she would be in a position to have you ever to thank.

2016-10-20 05:51:09 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Easy.
1. She has very few real convictions. She sways with the polls.
2. She doesn't take responsibility for her actions. Everything is instead a "vast right wing conspiracy".
3. She treated the military like crap when she was in the White House.
4. She counts Bill's experience as her own. It isn't.
5. I dislike anyone who is viciously ambitious and will step on people to get ahead. Does anyone honestly believe she would have stayed with Bill if it wasn't for her political ambitions? Is she really a door mat then?
6. She's a carpetbagger.
7. I never liked women in pant suits.
8. Above all, she's a socialist.
Some Hillary quotes...
"We're going to take things away from you on
behalf of the common good."

"It's time for a new beginning, for an end to
government of the few, by the few, and for the
few, and to replace it with shared responsibility
for shared prosperity."

"(We) can't just let business as usual go on,
and that means something has to be taken away
from some people."

"We have to build a political consensus, and that
requires people to give up a little bit of their own
turf in order to create this common ground."

"I certainly think the free-market has failed."

"I think it's time to send a clear message to what
has become the most profitable sector in (the) entire
economy - that they are being watched."

2007-09-28 08:42:17 · answer #6 · answered by thor_torkenson 5 · 3 1

Contrary to what my conservative counterparts say, I dislike her because she truly represents (in my mind), what so many liberals refer to as being a 'neocon'.

I look to her as being a special interest group and large corporate groupie and truly believe that under her, the monopolizing will continue. Also, I think that we'll see much more outsourcing than what we are seeing today.

I'm ready to get away from both the Bush and Clinton dynasties and get some new blood in D.C.

There, you have it. I could add a lot more to this, but won't bother because I think that most people can probably see where I'm coming from.

2007-09-28 08:37:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Her universal health care plan is the same as Bush's drug benefit except it pays different companies. Either way, its $110 billion for drug companies a year, or $110 billion for insurance companies a year.

She runs around collecting donations and support from the anti-war crowd, but she's repeatedly voted in support of the war and has stated several times she has no intention to end it immediately if elected.

So why do I hate her??? She's a freaking hypocrite. She walks one way and talks the other.

I dislike her for the exact same reasons I dislike Bush. She's a shill to the same industries, and supports the same never-ending war policies. Once again, no difference but a party logo.

2007-09-28 08:38:04 · answer #8 · answered by freedom first 5 · 3 1

I'm not a Hilliary fan, but I will admit that I often enjoy listening to what Bill Clinton says about philanthropy. I feel that the world is ready for change, but I'm not so certain she offers the kindof change we need. I would vote for her, if Obama dropped off the ballot or if they decided to run as a team. Everyone else on the ticket in my opinion are babbling idiots.
Unfortunately, I never believe anything anyone ever says to get elected, becuase very rarely do they ever live up to it. It's not always their fault either, but it just happens that way.

Personally I'd like to see Bill back in the white house. If that means putting Hilliary in the Oval office, Ok, things couldn't get worse than they are now.

2007-09-28 08:37:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Are "Hillary haters" informed? Of course not. Not about her policies, goals, and plans, at any rate. They ARE informed about her hair style.

Rush Limbaugh explained best why we should all hate Hillary. When she was First Lady, she changed her hair style. I kid you not! He showed clear proof that she changed the style of her hair, at least once. How can anyone love a president like that, much less a first lady?

I mean, really.

2007-09-28 08:44:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I dislike everything about her. Shes all fluff and wouldnt even be a canidate if not for her husband. I would take about all the other democrat canidates ahead of her. I dont like her policies as well...she is way to far left on abortion and such. her health care palns sucks compared to Romneys.

2007-09-28 08:33:55 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers