Starbucks b/c it's a legal "drug."
People don't even know they have an addiction to it and there is no special meetings for it or a cure.
2007-09-28 08:17:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Karma Eve 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Starbucks
2007-09-28 15:16:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, Starbucks costs a lot more.....
Starbucks, most times fills you with empty calories and caffeine.
Starbucks is a monopoly--can't say that about weed.
I've reached the conclusion that Starbucks is worse!!!!
2007-09-28 15:20:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Holiday Magic 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I thought about it for exactly 60 seconds, and I'm going to say Starbuck's is worse.
2007-09-28 15:17:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by dark is rising 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Starbucks... although marijuana in the long run isn't too good for your lungs, starbucks isn't very good for your body overall. Well, maybe neither is marijuana... hmmm..
Very good question.
2007-09-28 20:08:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Starbucks for sure
2007-09-28 15:18:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Marijuana
2007-09-28 15:17:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Stan the man 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
look, neither are bad. did you know marijuana is only illegal because in the 1930's the U.S. thot smoking it made you mad (as in crazy). which if of course, doesnt. so why is marijuana illegal? Starbucks is kind of silly because it's everywhere, london, berlin, paris, everywhere. i don't think either is worse than the other.
2007-09-28 15:21:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I believe starbucks is worse.
I thought about it for a little more than a minute, is that OK?
2007-09-28 15:21:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Starbucks, their production methods are questionable at best.
2007-09-28 15:17:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋