partying on ther own property i have to do a report thanks
2007-09-28 07:52:36 · 16 answers · asked by b-don 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
If you have ever been with drunken underage boys, you'll know these events spill over into other areas and end up hurting people.
2007-09-28 07:55:31 · answer #1 · answered by Steve C 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If all they're doing is partying, they should be left alone. However, I get the feeling you intentionally left something out. Something along the line of drinking, smoking pot, etc.
If that's the case, they should be busted, and there are no good reasons why the police are wrong for doing so.
2007-09-28 07:58:39 · answer #2 · answered by Pat S 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good reasons that police are WRONG?
It depends... how were they partying? If it was MERELY alcohol -- then using undercover cops is a waste of taxpayer money.
If it was DRUGS... then I'm definitely for the cops going after them as getting the small guys helps in getting the bigger ones.
2007-09-28 07:56:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
do unlike that one bit,,,i could say that sounds like an glaring violation of the fourth substitute however the splendid courtroom has already ruled the fourth substitute null and void for all useful applications, they could probable rule that it is okay by using fact cellular telephones did not exist in colonial days. What precisely are they searching for besides? How does a site visitors supply up justify looking your telephone records? i will hear the previous argument now,,,in case you have not something to cover than you will not strategies, in case you have a undertaking with it, then you definately would desire to be responsible of a few thing.
2016-12-17 12:19:55 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well, its not wrong if the party is at a private house, under the sound law, and all drinkers and users are of the leagle age. if any of that isint true, then the police have the right to bust. and under cover is perfectly fine, they're just doing there job
2007-09-28 07:56:32 · answer #5 · answered by cameragirl80 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It sure seems like a waste of tax payer money to be earmarking undercover officers for underage drinking stings.
2007-09-28 08:02:31 · answer #6 · answered by elysialaw 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i honestly don't think there are any. as long as the minors aren't doing anything illegal, then the cops shouldn't have any grounds to go undercover or break up the party. it doesn't really matter whose property is involved. any property that is involved in criminal activity ie. drugs, prostitution, illegal gambling, etc...is capable of being seized by authorities as well as the people involved being held accountable and punished accordingly. illegal activity is illegal activity. you can't just say "i'm on base, you can't get me" because you're on your property. and besides, it's not the minor's property, it belongs to the parents who i'm sure wouldn't be cool about their kids partying and potentially partaking in illegal activity.
2007-09-28 07:57:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
they're not under the supervision of adults. possibly: disturbing the peace, use of illegal drugs, gambling, statutory rape, vandalism, gang related activities...are their concerns...but how do the police know if they're on the OUTSIDE of the party....they're just doing ot in the minor's best interest.
2007-09-28 07:58:48 · answer #8 · answered by T-monster 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cant say I can think of any good reasons as to why they would be wrong to do so. Seems pretty clear cut and dried that they are in the right.
2007-09-28 07:56:02 · answer #9 · answered by Rick R , Super Duper Samurai 侍 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
the true it is that they should go undercover to find drug dealers and terrorist, kids in a party are important but not so dangerous like other things.
2007-09-28 07:58:35 · answer #10 · answered by Freg A 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋