Mr. Beauchamp is a liar, The New York times can't figure out if a mistake was made in the Move on Ad, The Ombundsman says they did and is contradicted by other staff members. And Media matters boosts a man kicked out of Boot camp and calls him a war Hero.
2007-09-28 07:44:11 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
If any of those left wackos would admit the Truth, they would be out of business. The new york times is very closed to it already. Give time to time, goodness always defeats evil
2007-09-28 07:51:02 · answer #1 · answered by Bego?a R 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I believe it was the New York Times was caught publishing stories that a writer was simply making up. It may have been a different paper, but I believe I'm right.
It was some time before someone checked his sources that didn't exist or proved that this guy was making it all up.
Same thing here. Assess collateral damage and do damage control and hope it goes away. They roll their eyes up to the sky, put their hands in their pockets, whistle and slowly and embarassingly walk away.
2007-09-28 07:49:42 · answer #2 · answered by rann_georgia 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
because they are a part of the liberal media system in which they twist the truth (especially the facts about the troops) into what they think the anti-war mongrels want to hear or read.
2007-09-28 07:49:44 · answer #3 · answered by Rick K 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They all have a left wing liberal agenda. They don't care about getting stories correct. They care about promoting liberalism.
2007-09-28 07:47:13 · answer #4 · answered by regerugged 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
haha i love that these other people don't know that the new republic is not liberal.
that's like saying the weekly standard is unbiased.
2007-09-28 07:51:08 · answer #5 · answered by brian 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, no liberal bias here is there?
/sarc
2007-09-28 07:47:08 · answer #6 · answered by Mark A 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋