Do they have burkas that big?

Question

Muslim jihadist leaders are inviting Rosie O'Donnell to come and visit them in the Middle East.

Muslim jihadist leaders interviewed for a new book were ecstatic about statements from television talk host Rosie O'Donnell about the war in Iraq and the global war on terror, agreeing with her outspoken views.
Some even invited her on a "fact finding mission" to the Middle East.

http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=57860

Who thinks that Rosie should go on this "fact finding" mission and do you trust her judgment?

Answer 1

I knew this was a Rosie question before clicking the link. Thanks for not disappointing. LOL

ADDED: Wow, Iltrix, I'm usually good at reading between the lines, but you're psychic. I think you've missed the point about who might be considered qualified to go on a fact-finding mission.

Answer 2

I ran across this and had to answer. First, I'd like to applaud you for putting some humor into this. Most level headed people realize that Rosie is nothing more than a big mouthed joke! As far as it not being any of your business as some crazed person basically said. It is your business. This is our country and Rosie is not our spokesperson, nor is that nut an expert. So yeah, it's your business, my business and the business of everyone in this country.

These mindless socialists with their progressive nonsense are as bad if not worse than the heathen that you've asked this question about.

Bravo for a great question and making it humorous. We can all stand some of that in times like this. To heck with those who showed up here because their friends sent them over to put you down. I'm pretty open minded and am a registered independent, but I think you've offended a group of gay women and they're all showing up to add their two cents. This makes it even funnier!

Answer 3

i desire to recommend that the precise shrink for contributions be carried out away with, and that the optimum payouts in retirement nevertheless stay as they're, adjusted for inflation. Social shield practices isn't a "furnish away" application yet one that each and every physique persons contribute to love a value inexpensive expenses plan, and must be shield against distinctive makes use of with the aid of capacity of the government. Do you compromise or disagree and why? in case you're so nervous approximately it then why do now not you; first located it lower back into the indoors optimum sector and make to have been no can take out funds from it for their own interest, 2d pay lower back each and every penny you have borrowed from the two Social shield practices and Medicare, 0.33 take the unlawful immigrants off of it and persons who come over precise here yet with the aid of no capacity paid a penny to it, and finally have it the same for each guy or woman; in distinctive words government officers are to take part in it and in the event that they % some thing extra advantageous they do it on their own devoid of the tax payers investment it?yet, the financial stytem feeding the imbalances had with the aid of no capacity been particularly replaced. They, a team of scholars, stated that each and every and all and sundry expenses of interest must be 3% or much less for each guy or woman to alter into wealthy if mandatory (that could desire to be genuine additionally to taces). the exceptional financial undertaking must be, they stated, whilst there have been no expenses of interest. Why now not attempt this answer? the wealthy ought to nevertheless be wealthy. My question is: whilst soial shield practices turns precise right into a undertaking appropriate to federal funds owed, why now not paintings with a balanced or earnings funds and spend no extra advantageous than is available in, as any family members participants has to attempt for? Why now not ban all loobying provides as a thank you to get rules that serve the country? God bless u . s . a . of united states of america.

Answer 4

I often joke about the Islamic extremists chiding women for inadvertantly showing an exposed ankle, because "it is an abomination to Allah".

Well, the joke's on me. In Rosie O'Donnell, the Jihadists finally have found an ankle (and calf, and leg, and the whole rest) which really IS an abomination to Allah!

Answer 5

Well it shows why we wanted her off the View, her view is disgusting enough to get terror leaders to invite her to their homes. I don't think they have burkas that big and I thought the Iranian leader said their were no gays in Iran. Will she not travel there or as Trump said is she so ugly the Iranians and terrorists thinking she is a man.

Answer 6

The penalty under Sharia law for homosexuality is a long drop on a short rope, but in Rosies case they better use two ropes, she weighs a bit

Answer 7

I think that it doesn't concern anybody what Rosie does. Not even you. I would like to see anorexic Coulture go to the Middle East on a 'fact finding mission', since we are playing on the weight issue now.

Heck, I would like to see any republican go, since stopping the culture clash of civilizations would do our country well at this point.

Nice non-biased link btw

Answer 8

YIKES!!!

Didn't we just learn there are no gays over there? Will Rosie be the first? I think she should try showing some leg under that burka and see what they do to her...

ADDED: Ha! Just saw RLP's answer...we are thinking alike! I had not read it prior to answering!

Answer 9

Uhhh , do they know she's a lesbian ? LOL , I guess we'll now see if Rosie really believes what she spews . If she believes they're harmless , she'll go . If she really believes that they hate lesbians , she'll stay here and make-up a lie about how it didn't fit into her schedule but she would've loved to have gone .

OMG . . .Wait A Minute Here !! . . .. . . What if the subject turns to 'carpets' ? . . . . .Between their prayer carpets / rugs and Rosie's carpet-munching , ooooh man , there could be some real interesting misunderstandings !!

EDIT** -- Ohhhh Noooo , what if they start talkin about 'pitchin tents' ?

Answer 10

I think she so go and find some facts. Lets make it a 20 year crusade and expect a report on 2027. We do not want to hear any prelimanary reports.