I dont think it was an accident.
2007-09-28 06:01:06 · 42 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
tgibbyson
I just think that the royals couldnt have her marrying a muslim and thats it really.so someone organised this"accident".There was a rumour she was pregnant but her friend(a very good friend)said she would have told her and she definitely wasnt.
I also remember one of dianas bodyguards who was killed in a motorcycle accident just along the road to where i live,and there had been rumours that she was getting "too close" to him.
I think that in 100 years time when people read the history books,they wont be at all surprised to read that she had died and will probably say "yeah it was obvious what happened"
2007-09-28 06:18:35 · update #1
Honey
I dont think that octor was married,but apparently she was madly in love with him.And I agree with you,it seems really suspicious that she said "you"ll be shocked at what I do next" to the reporters who were following her around.
2007-09-28 07:09:25 · update #2
without a doubt she was murdered.i totally agree with you ,the royal family couldn't handle the idea of that in the future the coming king would have a brother from a Muslim man which in sure he'll be Muslim that was so much to them so simply the easiest thing to do was killing her.
yup you are right
2007-09-28 08:32:32 · answer #1 · answered by viny616 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think it was a Thomas a Becket sort of thing, where Henry II said 'who will rid me of this turbulent priest' and someone duly obliged.
The two things that are bugging me most about this are ;
firstly, at some point during that summer Diana gave an interview say that on a certain date, a few weeks later, can't remember the date, maybe sometime in October, anyway, on that date she was going to make an announcement that would shock the world. There was a lot of speculation at the time as to what it might be, my point being that we'll never know now as she died before she could tell us.
secondly, someone made a statement saying that the Queens private secretary, and Diana's brother in law Robert Fellowes, was in the communications room of the British Embassy in Paris an hour before the accident. HE says he was at home in England. Now, we're not talking about MacDonalds here, if he was at the Embassy there'd be some kind of record. If he was at home surely there'd be witnesses. Why on earth does this question remain unanswered more than 10 years later?
2007-09-28 08:43:53 · answer #2 · answered by proud walker 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
do you remember David Kelly (UN weapons inspector ) saying he'd be found dead in the woods?
Diana said much the same thing, months prior to her death.
They ( the royal establishment ) wanted her dead.
it would more likely be a convenient car accident, where laying-in-state, wouldn't be an option.
they wanted her to blend back into the oblivion she'd been picked from, after providing the house of windsor with an heir or two,
she'd fulfilled her purpose.
but when she proved to be more popular than the rest of them put together, she had to go.
or charlie would never get to marry his bit on the side & live happily ever after.
one day he seriously does think he & his horse, will sit on the throne.
history books show us that people have been killed, over the throne of England.
& diana marrying a muslim, was just too much for them to bear!
2007-09-28 07:11:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
I have always thought that her death (and others who also died) was suspicious.
I have been led to believe, that Diana was pregnant, but the father was not Dodi, - they had a very genuine friendship but no more than that. The father was apparently the married Doctor she had an affair with months before.
Last year, by pure chance I found my hotel in Paris, was very close to the tunnel where the fatal crash occurred, Iknow it sounds terrible, but because of morbid fascination, I went to have a look, and pay my respects - I was amazed by how small it actually was!
It's odd that just weeks before she died, she said that she had news that was going to shock the world.
Trevor Rhys Jones - the only survivor, lives not far from me - and to my knowledge he has never told anybody his version of what happened - can he not remember? or does he have to keep quiet?
2007-09-28 07:02:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
accident. once you somewhat seem at each and every of the variables in the case, there is not any way they could all have been pre-deliberate. And Diana herself possibly might have survived if she'd been donning a seat belt. If it grow to be a homicide attempt, it grow to be an extremely newbie one. If every person had had to homicide Diana there could have been a lot extra advantageous techniques. to illustrate, she enjoyed swimming in the sea. An murderer in scuba kit ought to actual have grabbed her and held her below the outdoors till finally she drowned. Voila, a homicide that feels like an accident, devoid of info (which incorporate seat belts) left to possibility.
2016-10-20 05:35:47 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was definitely an accident. When someone young, beautiful and glamourous dies young the world just can't accept it - Marilyn Monro being a classic example. How and when could anyone have tampered with the car - how did anyone know she'd be in it, how did anyone know which route she'd take, how did anyone know she wouldn't survive an accident and do you really think the French medical services would help kill her? Sorry, it's just too stupid a way to try and murder someone.
It's a tragic accident. End of story.
2007-09-28 08:20:07 · answer #6 · answered by threepenny53 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Without doubt the inquiry backed by the establishment, will report it was an accident. Strange that this is the third inquiry and the previous inquiries have been disbanded. Personally I believe there remains many questionable factors.
--CCTV camera .. why were ALL the CCTV cameras turned off?
--reports of another car in the tunnel?
--can a driver so intoxicated drive at the reported speed?
--if drunk - how did he manage to drive as far as the tunnel?
--he didnt look drunk on the video.
--if reported as drunk, who allowed him to drink so much and allow him to get behind the steering wheel.
... finally which government dept will now discredit these posts?
2007-09-28 06:08:30 · answer #7 · answered by john 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
It is Mohammed al Fayed, with the help of the Daily Express who has kept this murder theory going. I am sure he was grief stricken over the death of his son and that has exacerbated his long standing grudge agains the Government and the Royal Family. Let's face it, it has been said all along that if Diana and Dodi had been wearing seat belts they would probably have survived, as did their bodyguard.
According to Diana's closest friends she was not thinking of marrying Dodi and he was just one of her flings designed to make Dr Asnat Khan jealous.
2007-09-28 08:42:22 · answer #8 · answered by Beau Brummell 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bit of both really. There is no way that the C.C.T.V. camera's in a 1st World Country would turn off especially on the route which a royal princess drives on. But if they did not work then they would definantly work to get them on in quick time.
Really wouldn't want to say it wasn't an accident.
2007-09-28 06:06:37 · answer #9 · answered by A . Z . 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋
i don't believe it was an accident. i think Diana was conveniently "removed", too many questions not answered, such as ALL the camera's not working in the tunnel, the ambulance taking soooooo long to get to the hospital that was 5 mins away.
definitely murder.
2007-09-28 08:09:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋