They should be ashamed of themselves. Hillary and Bill. I realize that they are a big part of these far left nut sites but still. They don't have enough class to stand for our troops and their leader.....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2SIIwUOj20
2007-09-28 05:21:39 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Swift boaters were telling the truth and backed up their assertions with facts unlike libs beloved moveon. As for Max Cleland. He did the same thing against Saxby Chambliss.
2007-09-28 05:31:28 · update #1
How can you libs trash the swift boaters when there were hundreds of them. Only one Kerry. So you took his word for it. No wonder he lost....
2007-09-28 07:09:39 · update #2
Excellent question. This will be her downfall. moveon.org has no idea how much damage they did to getting the Democrat Party. No idea.
2007-09-28 05:25:31 · answer #1 · answered by reaganite27 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
I think you answered your own question with your additional details (although you're stunningly incorrect about the Swift Boat ads, which were never verified with anything close to real evidence). Character assassination is a tool used by both sides. Taking umbrage when the side you oppose does it, but giving flimsy excuses for your own party doing the exact same thing, is just evidence that party loyalty means far more to you than actual principles.
If Bush had no reason to disavow the Swift Boaters, Clinton has no reason to disavow MoveOn. Period. Don't like the tactics? Ream out your own party FIRST. They're the one who answer to you.
2007-09-28 05:40:30 · answer #2 · answered by Zafrod 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Oh, puhleez, give me a bloody break. Bill called the GOP on it, and you're just whining about it.
Talk about total hypocrites here....when the tactical playbook of the GOP is to use character assassination like the Swift Boaters, the Chambliss ads, the Willie Horton ad. I'll never go broke underestimating the gall of rightwingers who give no quarter when it comes to attacking the character and patriotism of their opponents, but cry like babies when just a little of it gets thrown back in their face. Just like a boxer with a glass jaw.
2007-09-28 07:04:59 · answer #3 · answered by Silverkris 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why should anyone condemn MoveOn.org for voicing their right of free speech? The real question should be why do the Repubs want to censor all thought to only that which they agree with? The Repubs seem more like 1940 Germany than 2007 US.
2007-09-28 05:38:26 · answer #4 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Thank's for that awesome link. I love watching Bill rip you idiots a new one. Why won't republicans condemn swift boaters????
LOL facts...I love it....It's easy to say it's backed up with "facts" but since there are none I guess it's difficult to prove....
2007-09-28 05:28:16 · answer #5 · answered by Franklin 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Because free Speech still matters.
I may not agree with moveon.org (and I don't) but I will defend to my death their right to say what they want. Perhaps the Clinton's feel the same way.
Why so worried about what they said anyway? Does it matter? Does the ranting of extremist on either the left, like Move on or the tight like Ann Coulter really matter? Would we not all be better served by discussing the issues and letting the insane on either side fall to the way side?
2007-09-28 05:28:02 · answer #6 · answered by Thomas G 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Moveon.org is now the biggest donor to the Democratic party. Although they do not support all democrats and will attack democrats who do not support their views. They want there money and do not want them to start launching attack adds against them.
2007-09-28 05:31:40 · answer #7 · answered by Chris 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because they see it for what it is, namely a ridiculous non issue created by the right. Most of the people who criticize the add have obviously not read the whole thing because they are constantly misstating what it says.
2007-09-28 05:30:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
It was set up by Clinton friends and money from George Soros. That's why.
2007-09-28 05:48:37 · answer #9 · answered by JB 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
why?
Why wont the Republican condemn the ads on Max Leland?
2007-09-28 05:25:21 · answer #10 · answered by BrushPicks 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋